It seems simple to implement, and it might lead to more engagement (for the platforms that care about that).

Instead, people rely on third-party tools to accomplish scheduling on Reddit and Instagram. Why is that? Is there some issue I’m not considering?

  • rah
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    scheduling

    What do you mean by that?

    • Otter@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Gmail has something similar, instead of the post going out when you click post you can set it to go live at a certain time

      I know friends have used the third party schedulers when promoting events on Instagram, where the posts needed to go out at a certain time (ex. releasing tickets at a certain time for fairness). Others might want to post right around when people are likely to be looking at their phones.

      There is also a similar service for Reddit, and now for Lemmy: https://schedule.lemmings.world , where mods can schedule reoccurring posts (ex. TV shows, weekly events)

      Personally, I’d like to sit down and prep some posts, then have them go out slowly. Rather than all at once spamming people’s feeds. schedule.lemmings.world works great, and I posted this to see if there’s any reason to not integrate it into main Lemmy

      • edric@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you have a business account/page on Meta, you can schedule posts for both facebook and instagram. I believe you can also schedule tweets., although not sure if you can do it on a personal/individual account. Those are limited to photos/videos/reels though, not events or something.

  • ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Most social media platforms make money when you actively engage with them. Having scheduled posts removes that from them. So now they have less revenue and they have to spend more money maintaining a feature. As such there’s no incentive for them.

  • subtext@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    My guesses would be:

    1. If you’re able to use tools to just post at a certain time, you might be less likely to engage with the platform.
    2. They can upsell you on their paid API (which is probable how corporations would prefer to operate anyways).
  • dumples@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Some social media has a schedule post for business accounts. You have to pay a certain fee to be a business account. So you can do it but you have to pay. The found that people are willing to pay for the feature so they won’t give it away for free

  • null@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    They want you going to the site actively every time you post so you’re more likely to engage with other content.

  • key@lemmy.keychat.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s a cost to maintaining a feature. Unless a certain percentage of users would actively use the feature and it would improve your KPIs more than another feature that could be implemented in the same period with the same maintenance cost, it’s not worth it and will never be prioritized.