Then make that “choice” a choice for Ranked Choice Voting at the local level. The Constitution allows for this option. The founding fathers didn’t have access to the math that proves FPTP is the worst possible voting system, despite England using FPTP since the middle ages, or as much as 600-800 years at that point.
The problem is the American system of democracy as it is currently organized is too geared to protect the interests of the ruling class.
I compellingly agree that ranked choice or proportional representation would alleviate many of the issues we have, but, unlike many epochs of human history, we are literally running out of time.
too geared to protect the interests of the ruling class
That is literally what it was designed to do, so it’s doing its job. The founding fathers hated democracy but needed a way to make it appear like they didn’t with the constitution. As AdrianTheFrog pointed out, one of the federalist papers for a US government class literally just admits:
“A rage for paper money, for an abolition of debts, for an equal division of property, or for any other improper or wicked project, will be less apt to pervade the whole body of the union, than a particular member of it” - James Madison, the guy who drafted the constitution
None of this will change without a revolution. So I agree with the post.
Then make that “choice” a choice for Ranked Choice Voting at the local level. The Constitution allows for this option. The founding fathers didn’t have access to the math that proves FPTP is the worst possible voting system, despite England using FPTP since the middle ages, or as much as 600-800 years at that point.
The problem is the American system of democracy as it is currently organized is too geared to protect the interests of the ruling class.
I compellingly agree that ranked choice or proportional representation would alleviate many of the issues we have, but, unlike many epochs of human history, we are literally running out of time.
That is literally what it was designed to do, so it’s doing its job. The founding fathers hated democracy but needed a way to make it appear like they didn’t with the constitution. As AdrianTheFrog pointed out, one of the federalist papers for a US government class literally just admits:
None of this will change without a revolution. So I agree with the post.