Also, the Jewish God and Muslim Allah are on the International Space Station.

  • prole@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    True. If only the was more than one story from his life between being a child, and being in his 30s… Oh well I guess we’ll just have to assume he lived as a monk and denied himself of anything pleasurable 🙄

    Though I recently learned that there is a book about it, it’s just that it wasn’t chosen to be “canonical,” and therefore means you can ignore it completely? Curiously, Jesus does some really fucked up things in that book, including showing off his powers, and killing people just to bring them back to life. The Infancy Gospel of Thomas is the book btw.

    Who gets to decide that book isn’t true but the rest are?

    • Flax
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      The infancy Gospel of Thomas was written well over one hundred years after Jesus had already left earth, in the second century. It claimed that Jesus performed random frivolous miracles for fun, when the Gospel of John said that the water to wine miracle was the first. We also don’t know who “Thomas the Israelite” is either.

      It’s likely just something someone made up to try and give a narrative for Jesus’ childhood.

      Jesus also likely cast the demons out of Mary Magdalene while in His thirties. Jesus wouldn’t need a female partner if He actually was truly God.

      • prole@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        When were Matthew, Mark, Luke and John written?

        Here, let me save you a quick Google:

        The Gospel of Mark probably dates from c. AD 66–70, Matthew and Luke around AD 85–90, and John AD 90–110. Despite the traditional ascriptions, all four are anonymous and most scholars agree that none were written by eyewitnesses.

        Oh look at that.

        after Jesus had already left Earth

        Lol ok bud. Whatever delusion makes you happy.

        • Flax
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          What are you trying to prove? The infancy gospel of thomas was written likely around 180AD and even then, people were already calling it out as being a fake.

          You clearly aren’t looking for an open-minded discussion by calling me “delusional”, anyway.

          • prole@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Imagine using such a piss poor method of finding truth for literally anything in your life besides religion.

            Would you consider me delusional if I told you that I have an invisible dragon in my garage, and that he’s died several times, and has returned to Earth after each time?

            • Flax
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              Do you have proof of this invisible dragon?

              • prole@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                I’m glad you asked!

                Come on by my garage, the dragon’s right there. Though I guess I did forget to mention that he’s invisible.

                (In case you weren’t aware, I’m referencing a famous Carl Sagan essay/short story from his book “The Demon-Haunted World - Science as a Candle in the Dark” and obviously he did a much better job laying it out than I ever could. Here is the text of the essay plus explanation: https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/The_Dragon_in_My_Garage. By the way, incredible book that should be required reading for every adult human on the planet.)

                Here is the conclusion of the essay where he does a pretty good job explaining what the point of it was:

                Now, what’s the difference between an invisible, incorporeal, floating dragon who spits heatless fire and no dragon at all? If there’s no way to disprove my contention, no conceivable experiment that would count against it, what does it mean to say that my dragon exists? Your inability to invalidate my hypothesis is not at all the same thing as proving it true. Claims that cannot be tested, assertions immune to disproof are veridically worthless, whatever value they may have in inspiring us or in exciting our sense of wonder. What I’m asking you to do comes down to believing, in the absence of evidence, on my say-so.

                • Flax
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  I do ask you though, how would you prove God, if He was real? It’s not like you can say “if God is real, then ice would melt if exposed to heat”, could you? What proof would convince you, personally?

                  • prole@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    I don’t know. Scientific evidence that is reproducible would be a good start. The scientific method is the only method I’m aware of that we have to accurately explain and predict the natural processes surrounding us.

                    One thing I do know, if I were God and I wanted people to know I was real, I would know exactly how to do that. There wouldn’t be a question about which sect is correct, because I am all-knowing; I know exactly what it would take for each person.

                    But we also know that there are people who will not go to heaven, and instead will suffer for eternity in absence of God… So that means that there are people (quite a few) that God created knowing full well that they are “destined” to burn for eternity. Sorry, but that’s really fucked up.