I’m sure many new users are curious.

  • npastaSyn@kbin.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m curious if that works with unfederated servers or servers that simple just get shutdown. Ie xyz government decides to raid the servers, (is there redundancy in the data?)

    • themadcodger@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Currently, no. Right now you tell your new instance to expect a transfer from your old. Then you tell your old your new instance and if they match, the transfer begins. In your example, you wouldn’t be able to do half the steps needed so it would fail. And since each server is unique, it would be up to them whether or not there were any backups or not.

      • npastaSyn@kbin.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thanks! Are the systems standalone or can they be distributed or mirrored? Seems like a potental single point of failure if the instance is literally running on someone’s personal server.

    • MeowdyPardner@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I guess the main challenge would be proving to the new instance that the old offline instance authorized the transfer, maybe something like a keypair could be generated with each account and a signed proof attached to the user profile that gets federated around as other servers receive user profile objects, then provide an account backup function that lets you save the keys as a file so the importing server can verify the key and federate the change of ownership of content to other instances somehow.