• LazaroFilm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    After XP, Windows focused on adding crap to their aid that use unnecessary resources for crap things. I remember the Aqua look on Vista that sucked the life out of computers. Let’s not talk about Windows Me. Then 8 was a weird interface that no one liked and also not compatible with older machines. So XP is the most stable Windows os that can run on older devices.

    • Boozilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      131
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      XP still had the designed-by-engineers vibe. Since then, Microsoft got completely taken over by dipshits with marketing MBAs.

      They now code Windows to impress executives and shareholders with how much they can harvest data and manipulate customers into using their stupid Store and so on. They stopped caring about the experiences of power users, or even casual users.

      They don’t want the OS to work for us. They want us to work for them.

      • KingBoo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Very well said.

        Do you have any suggestions for people wanting to go back to an XP feeling?

        A particular distro of Linux, etc.?

        • gaterush@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          I second the recommendation of giving Linux Mint a shot. I didn’t use XP extensively but Mint is low hassle and gets out of your way.

          I’m not sure it has quite the same feel, but closest I can think of that is also approachable coming from Windows. Obviously a lot of other distros also satisfy the “built by engineers” vibe.

          • OscarRobin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            6 months ago

            Linux Mint is definitely the closest interface- and vibes-wise to XP imo, of the big distros worth considering

        • Boozilla@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          6 months ago

          I have a lot of respect for Linux and use it here and there, but I am by no means an expert on it. The best thing I’ve done with it so far is running a Pi Hole at home.

          Unfortunately, my job involves using MS Windows. A lot. After I retire…soonish…I hope to take some time and learn Linux better.

          For my day-to-day Windows misery, I find that ShutUp10 does a great job of toggling off the bullshit you don’t want running. And it’s easy to toggle things back on if you ever need to. It’s a free program you can download and run. I send them a little money every year out of gratitude, but donations are completely optional.

          Some FUD mongers will tell you that ShutUp10 ‘breaks’ Windows. That’s simply not true. It puts all the Windows settings you can change yourself in one easy-to-find place. Things that are normally scattered all over the UX and the registry.

          While you could mess some things up using it if you’re not careful, it’s very good about color coding and letting you know which toggles are best to turn off, which ones are a little questionable, and which ones you should leave turned on (unless you know what you’re doing and can take the risk). I have used it for years now, on multiple PCs, with zero problems. It doesn’t make Windows 10/11 GOOD but it makes them less horrible.

          https://www.oo-software.com/en/shutup10

          • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Britec09 from the video there is quite skeptical - sounds like he prefers ShutUp10. With Atlas, he worries about large security impacts for small FPS gains.

            Good watch, thank you!

      • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        6 months ago

        Though enshittification was coined, I think, with online services in mind, this is a perfect example of the process as it applies to an OS.

        • Boozilla@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 months ago

          Completely agree. For some reason that word tends to trigger a few gatekeepers on here. But I think it fits.

        • Emerald@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          The enshittification of windows is because of its online services. Copilot AI, “telemetry”, ads, etc.

    • umbrella@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      To be fair, vista and 7 had a lot of QOL improvements too.

      I dont see the point of 10+ though, they pretty much just added fluff.

      • LazaroFilm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        They had QOL but I remember my machines running significantly slower. And that was not worth the extra QOL.

    • TopShelfVanilla@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      XP was a pretty good running OS with plenty of software and games. I held out till 10 was out for a bit and there were programs I wanted to run that required it.

    • Rhaedas@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      WinME was that OS I ripped off a brand new laptop and replaced with 98SE so it would function correctly. When it crashes and hangs right out of the box…