• toiletobserver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    It isn’t that we don’t like your answer, it is that it is fundamentally wrong. I do live an hour commute from Seattle, maybe more, and if you had two people making minimum wage full time with no other debt obligations, you can’t even afford a vacant lot, let alone somewhere with a house, even with one that looks like the fight club house.

    • Kinglink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Let’s start over and give you all another chance to downvote me.

      If you can’t afford to live where you are you should look elsewhere that there is a better cost of living.

      Your choosing to live and work in Seattle what’s next? Telling me you can’t make ends meet in LA?

      Yes those places are expensive because the demand is more than the supply. There’s hundreds of big cities out there. Go look up some that have low cost of living. I’ll start you off.

      Edit: what a surprise. I guess we will just be the victim with out attempting to do anything to change the situation.

      • GuerrillaGrain@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        A major problem with moving to these cities is the availability of comparable income and capable infrastructure for the incoming population. Any exodus from one high density area to another will have noticeable impact on the local economy. One that is inescapable is rising rent. Suggesting that renters relocating from California to Ohio will solve the rent crisis doesn’t account for those already living in these areas. It also doesn’t account for the population that a community was built to support and the systems put into stress to accommodate for them.

        Above you replied to someone that mentioned living near Seattle. The impact of commuters leaving the Seattle area to the neighboring cities reaches as far north as Burlington, Bellingham, Blaine, and Ferndale. These are at times more than 2 hour commutes. Well above the parameters your solution describes. Within the past decade rents in these areas have steadily risen to meet demand. Pricing out many of the locals who were there before. Now, many who moved to these smaller towns are finding themselves in the same situation as the persons they originally displaced.

        Sure if you were to search for affordable rents in these cities, there are some that come up from time to time. Though not nearly enough to support the growth these areas are experiencing.

        I suppose what I mean to say is: This problem, like homelessness, cannot be solved by simply moving those affected elsewhere.

        Source: In my last job I assisted with background checks for renters. One unit can receive hundreds of applicants. There simply is not enough housing for all that seek it.

      • halferect@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        What happens when everyone moves to these affordable places? The same thing that happens in all places, not enough housing and not enough jobs. So saying move somewhere cheap and problem solved doesn’t solve anything. Also, I grew up in my town, i have lived here my entire life and you think I should just go start over? This town is my home and I love it, and the solution is stopping multiple home ownership and stopping air bnbs not just leaving my life behind to move to Cleveland.