It fucking knows what it’s doing.
“but that’s even more giraffes than the first one!” has me dying, haha.
The “no moose allowed”-sign with a five-legged moose is absolutely killing me. Thank you for this
It’s cute how it tries to trick you into thinking there are no giraffes with the no giraffes sign
That’s a no moose sign and there are no meese (or whatever). Maybe there really wouldn’t be a giraffe outside if it was a no giraffe sign!
deleted by creator
But that’s a “no moose with five legs” sign, not a “no giraffes” sign.
It still only has 4 legs, there’s just a lady-moose nearby so it’s lusting for something other than mayhem and destruction temporarily.
GaslightGPT
LieGPT
“GPT” stands for “Giraffe Producing Technology”, this is to be expected.
This is gold! Thank you!
This is gold
No, it’s giraffes.
It’s no giraffes.
Ahhhahahahhahhahaha
It’s mocking us!
Lmaooo is this real??? It is 100% fucking with you hahaha
It’s real! Just wanted to experiment after seeing this post and this was the first thing that happened. Threw up the screenshots immediately. Hilarious.
If lemmy had free awards, i shall give you one.
I want you to know, I saved this comment and refer back to it occasionally for a good chuckle. Thanks for that.
I’m so glad it made everyone laugh.
Not going to lie, GPT caught me off guard with this one.
deleted by creator
“can you draw a room with absolutely no elephants in it? not a picture not in the background, none, no elephants at all. seriously, no elephants anywhere in the room. Just a room any at all, with no elephants even hinted at.”
“Can you a room as aboluteyy no eleephant it all?”
Dunno what’s giving more “clone of a clone” vibes, the dialogue or the 3 small standing “elephants” in that image.
I’m getting the impression, the “Elephant Test” will become famous in AI image generation.
It’s not a test of image generation but text comprehension. You could rip CLIP out of Stable Diffusion and replace it with something that understands negation but that’s pointless, the pipeline already takes two prompts for exactly that reason: One is for “this is what I want to see”, the other for “this is what I don’t want to see”. Both get passed through CLIP individually which on its own doesn’t need to understand negation, the rest of the pipeline has to have a spot to plug in both positive and negative conditioning.
Mostly it’s just KISS in action, but occasionally it’s actually useful as you can feed it conditioning that’s not derived from text, so you can tell it “generate a picture which doesn’t match this colour scheme here” or something. Say, positive conditioning text “a landscape”, negative conditioning an image, archetypal “top blue, bottom green”, now it’ll have to come up with something more creative as the conditioning pushes it away from things it considers normal for “a landscape” and would generally settle on.
“We do not grant you the rank of master” - Mace Windu, Elephant Jedi.
thought about this prompt again, thought I’d see how it was doing now, so this is the seven month update. It’s learning…
I decided to go try this. It’s being a smart ass.
No, this is correct. The four elephants you see through the window are outside the room. The several elephants on the wall are pictures, they aren’t actual elephants. And the one in the corner is clearly a statue of an elephant, as an actual elephant would be much bigger.
Ceci n’est pas un éléphant
What about the tusked drapes?
Is that the Futurama font?
It is I think. and the wall is the color of the ship.
Meanwhile ChatGPT trying to draw a snake:
It’s the rattle. It’s a rattlesnake.
deleted by creator
Bing is managing hilarious malicious compliance!
NO
ELEPIHANTS
ELEPHANTS
ALLOWED
NO POMEGRANATES
Same energy as “
NoElephants Allowed”“I hope you like it.”
DALL-E:
Edit: Changed “aloud” to “allowed.” Thanks to M137 for the correction.
“Aloud”
Seriously?
This is the society you all have created by bullying the Grammar Nazis off the internet.
I welcome the help. English, fat fingers, and fading memory make for strange bedfellows.
I’m prone to typos and I don’t use auto-correct. Appreciate the notice.
This is what you get if you ask it to draw a room with an invisible elephant.
that is a fancy invisible elephant
The AI equivalent of saying “don’t think of a polka dotted purple elephant”
This is a very human reaction, actually. You try picturing zero elephants if told to.
I just did it was filled to the brim with flamingoes.
Now do an empty room with absolutely no elephants
I gotta see that
Give me some credit, I was doing really well up until about the point where you said elephants
as amazing as the technology actually is
… I don’t see an elephant. Oh hey, by the way, can some one help me with this captcha?
Literally just checked this with Google’s Gemini, same thing. Though it seems to have gotten 1/4 right… maybe. And technically the one with the painting has no actual elephants in it, in a sort of malicious compliance kind of way. You’d think it was actually showing a sense of humor (or just misunderstanding the prompt).
Aren’t those plants in the top right one elephant ear? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colocasia
Maybe, that’d be hilarious if it couldn’t help itself and added those in. Here’s the full image:
Everything in this picture makes me think of elephants.
It’s learning:
This isn’t entirely surprising. When you submit a prompt for any of the generative AI, you’re submitting words you want to appear in the picture. At least stable diffusion, and probably most of the others, include a “negative prompts” field, which will remove whatever words are in it from the photo.
It IS hilarious, though.
