• Neuromancer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    4 months ago

    summarized in less than two and a half paragraphs

    It’s not that complex. Stop trying to commit genocide against Jews. Get rid of Hamas who has tried to stop any agreement to give the Palestinians any land.

    People often try to make things more complex because they’re trying to hide a weak argument.

    If Hamas went away, the life of Palestinians would radically improve.

    • TheFriar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      Right, so gonna continue on with this completely detached from reality nonsense while completely failing to respond to anything I say. This isn’t a conversation. I’m done beating my head against this wall. It’s clear you have no defense, are gaslighting people into thinking the destruction of Gaza is somehow “an active genocide against the Jews.”

      You’re sick. And you’ll get older one day and realize you were on the “Nazi/Hutu” side of genocidal history. Gross. And shameful.

      • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        4 months ago

        into thinking the destruction of Gaza is somehow “an active genocide against the Jews.”

        Oct 7th Hamas started a war with Israel. Israel is now dismantling Hamas. This was considered a genocide against Israel by international law.

        Once Hamas is gone, the war will end.

        It’s weird how you keep trying to defend genocide of the Jews.

          • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            4 months ago

            Not sure why you are trying to insult people who disagree with your stance. Is that how weak your argument is ?

              • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                Removed, rule 5:

                Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (perjorative, perjorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (perjorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!

              • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                4 months ago

                Ah another name calling session because you can’t articulate a point. You incorrectly couldn’t identify the genocide attack as declared by international law as the start of the current conflict.

                  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    Removed, rule 5:

                    Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (perjorative, perjorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (perjorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!