In my continued exposure to leftist spaces and a leftist view on history it has become clear that all I understand about Stalin is the reactionary rhetoric I’ve been fed my whole life. I have only just started on reading theory and exposing myself to a leftist view, so Stalin as a topic isn’t something I’ve reached yet.

But I have to ask, and I think this is the place to ask it, what is the deal with Stalin?

The vibe I get is that people at a minimum don’t hate Stalin, but also maybe at most appricate Stalin. I’m aware that the efforts of the USSR during WW2, especially in regards to Nazi aggression are a credit to his administration and leadership, but is that really where the vibe starts and stops?

I’m not looking for a dissertation on the guy, but just the notes or primary points. I’ll take reading suggestions too.

Thanks comrades.

    • GrouchyGrouse [he/him]@hexbear.netEnglish
      17·
      10 months ago

      Later in life he asked his mom why she beat him so bad as a kid and she told him so that he would become the good man that he was.

      I like telling people that bit if they think smacking kids is okay. Because they’re usually reactionary fucks that think Stalin was the devil incarnate.

      • Muad'Dibber@lemmygrad.mlEnglish
        15·
        10 months ago

        That’s only going to reinforce their view that Stalin was a mindless barbarian then. It’s like using a racist trope like saying, “we’re sophisticated brits, don’t act like an insert unsophisticated race here.”