• otp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    153
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    8 months ago

    that powers genocide

    Great that he’s standing up for himself!

    or surveillance

    …ok now why did you even send your resume to Google

    • neptune@dmv.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      The context was Gaza though, so I mean neutrally surveillance can mean lots of things: security cameras at a convenience store, a security contract for the government or another corporation. What this person was protesting was supporting Isreal and it’s war/control over Gaza. The article sort of misses the point and the headlines really kills it.

        • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I assume that user referred to “surveillance” in a broad sense as being more complicated than simply general population data collection. For example, you can be against some data collection, all data collection, no data collection, or other specific circumstances of data collection based on its content or use case.

      • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        73
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah it’s hard to shame someone for not springing to challenge their employer on every little thing the moment they become aware of it. Sometimes it takes a bit for things to pile up to the point it’s too much.

      • Pretzilla@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        8 months ago

        Really just the job, right? They can still get hired for their next job to not be evil.

        • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          My understanding is that no one’s been getting hired in tech right now due to all the hiring freezes. What world do y’all live in?

            • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              Fair enough. That hasn’t been my experience for the last almost 2 years. Teams in our org have been told that if they lose people they can’t hire replacements. Shit’s sucked

              I’ve also been hearing about massive layoffs at tons of the biggest companies. I’d be surprised if they were still hiring, obviously.

          • EatATaco@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            Work in tech. I still regularly get recruitment emails. if I had google on my LinkedIn, I assume I would be getting at least twice as many.

      • Carrolade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        55
        ·
        8 months ago

        Thinking these are some kind of noble sacrifices that somehow create real change in the world is pretty funny. That’s just not how corporations work.

        You think some google CEO is gonna go “oh gee, that engineer sure had a point. we better start caring about ethics again.”?

        There’s a difference between clickbaity stunts and effective protest.

        • krashmo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          42
          ·
          8 months ago

          I think this guy did what he felt he needed to do and it doesn’t have anything to do with us. Maybe it will spark change and maybe it won’t. The only thing I know for sure is that being a self righteous prick on the internet about his actions isn’t going to accomplish anything positive.

          • Carrolade@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            35
            ·
            8 months ago

            I think if he wasn’t looking for publicity, he would have tried to organize within his company. This kind of posturing stuff is just about image.

            Unless he’s some mental child or something, that just “couldn’t hold his intense feelings inside anymore” or whatever.

            He could have done something real. This kind of petulant bullshit isn’t it though. It’s just not how the corporate world works, it won’t move anything, and actually makes his cause look more childish.

            • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              8 months ago

              The guy should have organized the resistance or nothing at all. There is nothing in between right?

              If that action made just one person rethink their ethics, then it was worth it.

              And now that it is in the news, more people will see it and it will affect more people.

              Not everything is a fucking movie.

              • Carrolade@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                8 months ago

                Funny when sudden, out-of-place emotional outbursts are very cinematic, where slow, careful, well-thought-out, planning is really not.

            • twistypencil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Mental child? Are you ok? Maybe go outside and interact with some people not on the internet a little, because you kind of seem like you need to

          • Carrolade@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            32
            ·
            8 months ago

            I doubt there’s anybody in America past elementary school that hasn’t already talked about Gaza. If you want a protest to work, it has to apply some form of pressure. An easily replaced engineer with thousands of people lined up for his job quitting is not doing that. It just makes people that are already progressive on the issue feel better, which accomplishes zilch, except profit-generating clicks for news articles.

            If he was talking about the Sudanese civil war or something that might be a different story. Not Gaza though.

            • dank@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              28
              ·
              8 months ago

              Go ahead and describe what exactly he should have done to make an effective protest. In the meantime, consider that perhaps he simply did not want to be a cog in a genocidal machine as he clearly stated.

              • Carrolade@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                20
                ·
                8 months ago

                Look, I respect the guy for having the right opinion. But that’s not good enough in the real world. Never was, it takes more than that. If just being a decent fellow was enough to fix problems, we’d have fixed them all already.

                Harder decisions are required, it’s not easy. If he’d have leaked something, or maybe gotten himself fired for simply not-disruptively speaking out and sued or something, or organized a walk-out or whatever, that’d be admirable.

                This kind of “oh people on the internet are gonna like this” move is just immature though. It doesn’t do jack shit. Standing up isn’t good enough, just gets your fucking head blown off. That’s just how the world works. Entrenched power isn’t some dumb pushover, otherwise generations of activists would have pushed it over already.

        • aStonedSanta@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          8 months ago

          The fact there is conversation around this topic and it’s getting traction means humanity has the ability to ponder this. If human perception is changed by the conversation then his act has created an entire change in society. It just depends. Similar to the shot heard round the world. You never know what that “shot” will be.

          • Carrolade@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            23
            ·
            8 months ago

            You can handwave it away as some magical maybes if you want, but I prefer a more quantitative, substantial, evidence-based understanding. Less poetry, more fact.

            • aStonedSanta@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              8 months ago

              I agree with you 1000% tbh. It’s just a sign of change if things like this happen more and more. Then we start to see a factual pattern. As of now. Agree 1000%

        • twistypencil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          8 months ago

          Got news, clicks, eyeballs and engagement from the likes of you. Does that equal Google making the change? No, but every little insignificant bit adds up more than cynical internet comments do

        • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          There is no such thing as “effective protest”. There is action and inaction. Protest is an ineffective middle ground that allows the enemy to target, harass and arrest you.

          • Carrolade@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Now that’s an interesting stance. Depends what kind of protest you are talking about I suppose.

    • stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Nobody was worried when it was happening in the town over

      Nobody was worried when it was their neighbor

      Everybody lied to themselves when it was their friend

      And by the time it came to them there was nothing left but panic and dread.

      • odium@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago
        First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—
             Because I was not a socialist.
        
        Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—
             Because I was not a trade unionist.
        
        Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
             Because I was not a Jew.
        
        Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
        

        Ironic with the switcheroo on the last group

        • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Remember the Turner Diaries, on the Day of the Rope they don’t kill the minorities or queer folks or other “lesser thans”, they kill all the white people who are “race traitors” because they’re not also fascists.

          You are never safe from them, you’re just further down the list than who they’re after at this moment.

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    8 months ago

    “Earlier this week, an employee disrupted a coworker who was giving a presentation — interfering with an official company-sponsored event,” Google spokesperson Bailey Tomson says in an emailed statement. “This behavior is not okay, regardless of the issue, and the employee was terminated for violating our policies.”

    I guess they’ve gone from ‘disruptive’ to ‘disruption-averse’.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      World according to google.

      Abetting a genocide? A-OK.

      Speaking out against aiding a genocide? FORBIDDEN

      Wild how much “don’t be evil” Was holding them back, innit?

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I absolutely understand the sentiment of that engineer, but I also understand why they were fired. Maybe they wanted to get fired to make their point, but if they didn’t, yelling at an executive during a meeting is always a good way to get yourself fired no matter what that executive is saying.

    So while I don’t want anyone building such technology either, I hope that person knew the consequences they were facing.