• Queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    I never understand why in 2024 you’d buy nvidia, unless you like paying more for less, or buying from scalpers for even more money. I guess some people really just go “More money spent on it, more better” no matter what.

    • finkrat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      People just think “gaming?? OH NO I NEED MY NVIDIA!!!” while AMD is sitting there like “hey. Hey I have a card that’ll work. Hey. Card. Right here. Works better in Linux. Less headaches. Hello. Hey person. Card. Hi.”

    • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      A 1070 is hardly a card anyone would buy in 2024. Maybe they were running Windows before that and didn’t care that much.

      Also, hard to believe, but for a long while nVidia actually gave you the better experience on Linux. Before AMD had bought ATI. And probably a good while after the sale. The ATI drivers sucked ass.

    • twinnie
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      Because the features are better. That’s why most FPS comparisons of AMD and Nvidia always turn off the ray tracing.

    • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I’d like to buy AMD, but I have all these use cases

      • HDMI 2.1 (4K @ 120Hz) - relevant after recent news, if planning to use open source drivers
      • CUDA + Machine Learning applications
      • DLSS still visually better than FSR
      • Ray Tracing still better on GeForce cards
      • lemmeee@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        CUDA + Machine Learning applications

        AMD has HIP or Rocm, which unlike CUDA is free software. Any program that uses proprietary CUDA libraries is proprietary.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Well yes and no. There is proprietary software that uses CUDA but there also is other AI software that optionally uses CUDA. Usually there is a free software built version

      • NekuSoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I think the first one can be circumvented by just using a DP->HDMI adapter. But yeah, those other points are why I’m a bit hesitant about swapping to AMD myself.

    • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      NVIDIA still have the best performing cards if you care about ray tracing. I honestly think that’s the only reason to consider buying NVIDIA but you pay a heck of a premium for that.

    • rtxn@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Blender Cycles on Linux does not work with an AMD GPU. Updating either the kernel or ROCm has a 50-50 chance of completely breaking Cycles. By comparison, I had zero issues with Cycles, either CUDA or OptiX, on my 2060. OptiX is also a better denoiser that runs on the GPU, while AMD only has OpenImage that runs on the CPU (GPU support is questionable at this point).

      • lemmeee@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Updating either the kernel or ROCm has a 50-50 chance of completely breaking Cycles

        That sucks, but that doesn’t mean that it doesn’t work. I’m on Debian stable and it works fine for me, except for weird crashes from time to time.