Do you think that the fediverse has something to gain with the enshitfication of discord? Are there voice chat programs in the fediverse that can benefit from it?

    • morgunkorn@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s unfortunately barely usable, the responsiveness and features of discord are unmatched, in my opinion

      • rglullis@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        It is not perfect, but it has been usable for quite a while. It’s clocking already at tens of millions of active users per month, so it’s not like all these people are just suffering around and not chatting and talking with their groups.

        Also, unlike Reddit, it does not need to have a strong migration from all the long tail of niche communities. There are bridges already, so even if just, e.g, 5% of the discord base moves to it, it will be already enough to jumpstart a significant shift.

        • morgunkorn@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          I would love an alternative that works just as seemlessly yeah!

          The strength of Discord is its numerous partnerships with YouTube, Twitch, Patreon etc, making it trivial to gather paying supporters around a streamer or a video creator, attributing roles and perks automatically. I manage the patron community of a Minecraft gamer on YouTube and automatically sync the access to a community Minecraft server for people with a certain pledge on third part platforms, this would never work in the open source world, unfortunately

          • chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            I don’t know about other platforms, but YouTube membership is totally implementable on any other platform.

            The workflow anyone need to implement is the same flow Discord has implemented:

            1. Perform OAuth to get the user’s own channel using the mine filter on channels.list end point. This way the service can know SomeOneWatching is owner of channel UC1234ABCD
            2. Perform OAuth to get the host’s members on a fixed interval to get a list of all members, and match it against all known users’ channel IDs or target individual user like SomeOneWatching’s UC1234ABCD channel ID as part of filterByMemberChannelId on the same members.list end point.
            3. Upgrade users’ groups on the service to reflect membership accordingly, no direct YouTube partnership required.
            4. Revisit the same flow in 2 regularly to downgrade when memberships are not renewed; beyond the pubsubhubbub which notifies subscription content updates (new uploads/deletions) on a subscribed channel, YouTube does not have a push notification for automatic updates. This is why there’s always a slight delay when membership status changes.

            Source: I’ve worked in YouTube adjacent company using all of their public and several proprietary APIs for around 10 years now. I’m fairly familiar with their API offerings.

            • morgunkorn@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              That’s good to know, i thought it was be some kind of exclusive deal between the two entities.

              Of course, convincing people to get off Discord when almost everyone already have an account, a desktop app and a phone app ready to go sounds like a hurdle, but with time and enough enshittification™ anything is possible!

      • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        I wouldn’t say barely usable, but it does have a long way to go before it could be a replacement for discord, that’s true

    • XNX@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      No screen sharing or even video calls iirc. Soo many people use Discord to watch stuff with their friends or to play games with their friends. Matrix is more of a irc replacement imo it doesnt have any gaming focused features and the Forums on discord are nice too

    • Die4Ever@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      I haven’t tried matrix yet. What’s a good instance I can create my community on and bridge with my discord? For gaming communities.

      • jg1i@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        For Discord like communities, I’d also suggest using Element as the Matrix client. It’s pretty similar to Discord. Also, you’ll need support for “spaces”, which are like Discord servers. Rooms = channels

      • Cagi@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Yeah, there are some glaring issues with account and content deletion. Lemmy too, for that matter. If I delete something, I don’t want it to be just slightly obscured and easily recovered, I want it to be erased, unseeable forever. But that aspect of privacy doesn’t count in the FOSS circle jerk hive mind. “Keeping illegal revenge porn online forever is worth it so long as they don’t tell advertisers what colour I like”.

  • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    IMHO, the best thing people can do to help mass migrations is to build out Lemmy’s moderation and administration tools as fast as possible.

    They’re not great right now, and it’s really hard for Lemmy to keep up with the noise, spam, and trolls that come with a bigger community.

  • lemmyreader@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    8 months ago

    I fear it is like with WhatsApp : “But all my friends are on Discord so I have no choice!”.

  • taaz@biglemmowski.win
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    The reality is there isn’t an alternative that would be easy enough for non-tech people.

    I am never getting my friends off of Discord because there is nothing else that is easy for them and has same features - texting, calling and desktop sharing with sound.

    • flux@lemmyis.fun
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      8 months ago

      Revolt.chat is quite similar to discord and open source. They do run a centralized server to make it easy for everyone to get onboard, but it can be self hosted as well.

      That being said, I still don’t use it because nobody else does, and that’s the problem with all chat and social media apps.

    • kbal@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Matrix is easy unless you try to do something complicated with it.

      • Steal Wool@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Fr I finally started using it and it’s the simplest fuggin thing

  • go $fsck yourself@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    The recent headlines saying “discord will be showing ads” is just intentionally misleading. No one even bothered to read the articles. They just saw the headline that agreed “discord bad” and didn’t even question it.

    Discord already has “ads” in different forms that are even more like ads than what those articles were talking about. They promote games and services as a “perk” for nitro. They also advertise all over for their paid stuff, like Nitro and profile decorations.

    • Blaze@dormi.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I opened Discord yesterday, seems like now they even have lootboxes, what the heck

      • asqapro@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m not sure if you’re doing a bit, but that was an April Fools’ joke.

        • Blaze@dormi.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          You know what, they just seem so pushy lately about Nitro and stuff that I didn’t even get the joke

          • asqapro@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            That’s fair, I also fell for it originally. It was a pretty convincing prank, I really should be more suspicious on April 1st.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Revolt is so promising, except it’s not federated. I tried spinning it up today and then realized it’s local only…

      Which then even on their main page they have a pleading asking us to not host instances because the base will become fractured. Which, is solved by federation.

      • known@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        They have a page about federation, in which they explain why they haven’t implemented federation yet.

        In short: privacy concerns (e.g. metadata leakage), lack of devs / manpower & resources, difficulty adapting Revolts protocol to a federated one.

        I like the project. I think it would be the perfect place for Foss Projects and a good replacement for Discord, but it is in dire need of more contributors and ppl, who know how to properly integrate Federation. I’d love to see Revolt succeed.

        Currently I am short on time, but I’d love to contribute to them in the future.

  • Strayce@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Reddit was an easy switch for me because there wasn’t a social cost to leaving. There’s no way the discord communities I’m part of are switching, way too much hassle.

  • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    8 months ago

    I don’t use Discord much, but apparently it works a lot more like IRC (real time discussion) than like Lemmy/SubLinks/PieFed (asynchronous discussion) or Mbin (asynchronous disc + microblogging).

    If that’s correct, perhaps it would be simply better to code a Fediverse alternative to Discord, and make sure that it’s well integrated with Lemmy.

    • TheSambassador@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      How would a Discord-like application integrate with Lemmy? Are chat logs federated to posts in Lemmy? Do posts in Lemmy get federated to this other chat thing? Can you just sign into chat with your Lemmy username and that’s it? Is it just a chatroom that’s associated with a community?

      I feel like people here are like “everything should be federated” but sometimes I don’t really follow the thought process. I get it with Lemmy and Mastodon, but maybe someone could explain what a Federated Discord looks like.

      • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Someone smarter than me might have better ideas, but I picture a “Fediscord” (federated Discord) working this way:

        • There are multiple “Fediscord” servers. Each has its own chatrooms and users.
        • Users from one server are able to interact with chatrooms of other servers, as long as they federate.

        Then, when federating with Lemmy instances:

        • You can use an account from one of those services to interact with the other, no further registration needed.
        • You can follow “Fediscord” chatrooms from Lemmy as if they were communities. For reference, we can already follow PeerTube channels this way. (I feel like allowing the opposite would be unwise, given that Discord tends to be fast-paced; not sure though.)
        • You can quote Lemmy threads/comments to discuss them in Fediscord, as if you were quoting something from another server.
        • Shared DM system.
        • TheSambassador@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          I could see the login part being nice, but I still don’t really see the value in federating chat text. Honestly that would be a negative to me, I don’t really want my chat messages copied and federated out to other servers forever. Similarly, why would I want to view a chatroom through Lemmy? Why wouldn’t I just want to go to that community through it’s app or site or whatever?

          It just feels a bit like blockchain all over again. Federation and activitypub are great tools for some purposes but people seem to want to use them for everything.

          • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Discord isn’t just “chat text”, it’s also “real time discussion”. That’s why for example you see indie game devs often creating Discord channels, to contact their userbases.

            In this sense, it partially overlaps with a forum+link aggregator like Lemmy, that allows deeper and asynchronous discussion. But they’re still distinct enough so both a hypothetical “Fediscord” and Lemmy would benefit from federation:

            • If discussion in a “Fediscord” server is getting a bit too deep for the medium, you can redirect people to a Lemmy thread.
            • Conversely, if people just want to chitchat, in Lemmy they’ll end creating noise. They can simply do it instead in a “Fediverse” server.
            • A Lemmy mod team meeting in “Fediscord” to decide how they’re going to moderate their Lemmy comm.

            Nota bene: privacy is a concern and federating all content would be certainly unwise. Even across “Fediscord” servers. But some content is sensible, as long as you have a clear division between “public” and “private” rooms.

            Similarly, why would I want to view a chatroom through Lemmy? Why wouldn’t I just want to go to that community through it is app or site or whatever?

            CBA (can’t be arsed) is one of the main features of the race that we belong to, humankind. If you’re interested on a single “Fediscord” chatroom but can’t be arsed with the rest, you could follow it through Lemmy instead - it’ll be less optimal (F5, F5 all the time to see if there are new messages), but still useful.

            It just feels a bit like blockchain all over again. Federation and activitypub are great tools for some purposes but people seem to want to use them for everything.

            I get that when you have a hammer everything looks like a nail, but that isn’t my case here - I genuinely think that the “Fediverse forums” (Lemmy, Kbin/Mbin, and any potential newcomer) are in a central position within the Fediverse, and should capitalise on it by federating as much as reasonably possible with other Fediverse services.

  • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 months ago

    I don’t know where you’ve been, but Discord has been showing ads for a while now. If not for their own garbage they can barely deliver on, it’s in app sponsored merch and discounts. usually for video games and such

  • HorreC@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    I still like guilded more then discord to start. So I wont have to move. But I wouldnt mind trying Matrix.

  • Phegan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    Discord isn’t really applicable to the fediverse but that doesn’t means that FOSS can’t benefit. Are there good alternatives.

  • Blackmist
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m not convinced Lemmy-style Federation lends itself well to the Discord model.

    Like, you could have individual servers running (or maybe a server that hosts many communities), and a client that connects to all your subscribed ones, but I don’t think there’s a lot of value in sharing that data out across many servers, or somehow mangling real-time voice into that model.

    • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Same account different servers would mimic discord. So you have one app, but the communities or ‘discord server’ can be their own instance. If it’s mimicking discord it will keep all the message boards private to users like discord, but it could still benefit from Lemmy/Mastodon integration. Many communities have a discord and a sub Reddit having the same account on both may be valuable to some people.

      I don’t know the state of voice and video calls in the fediverse, it seems to be the main benefit of discord. Otherwise discord is just a terrible closed version of forums/subreddit/communities.

  • asudox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Instead of the fediverse, it would be good if users switched to Revolt instead. Or maybe we can make a federated discord alternative, though Revolt was talking about federation a while ago.