ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝A to searchengines@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agoGoogle search is losing the fight with SEO spam, study saysarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up177arrow-down12cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.ziptechnology@slrpnk.nettechnology@lemmy.worldhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up175arrow-down1external-linkGoogle search is losing the fight with SEO spam, study saysarstechnica.comᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝A to searchengines@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square6fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.ziptechnology@slrpnk.nettechnology@lemmy.worldhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foo
minus-squareJeeBaiChow@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·8 months agoShould we blame all the counter algorithms that attempt to game the results towards certain content providers, or the growing base of shitty content designed to garner eyeballs versus having any substance?
minus-squareᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝OPAlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down1·8 months agoOr should we blame Google because it’s their page ranking these sites are trying to game? Ultimately, it seems like an algorithmic arms race with both sides vying to maximise as/affiliate revenue at the expense of the human users.
Should we blame all the counter algorithms that attempt to game the results towards certain content providers, or the growing base of shitty content designed to garner eyeballs versus having any substance?
Or should we blame Google because it’s their page ranking these sites are trying to game?
Ultimately, it seems like an algorithmic arms race with both sides vying to maximise as/affiliate revenue at the expense of the human users.