Jack Gleeson
And the sad thing about this is that the kid is apparently a fucking angel irl lol.
A real autism! He/him bisexual man that might be a demiboy but probably not. I like media. Extraordinarily DILF.
Jack Gleeson
And the sad thing about this is that the kid is apparently a fucking angel irl lol.
https://x.com/Pwnitz/status/1804743575218839578
Why would you think that? That tweet almost single-handedly ended the anti-electoralism movement among the Very Online Twitter Left
lmaooooooooo
Yeah but the intent of the post and the way its used on social media is for liberals to tut tut leftists for supporting direct action over electorialism. So the comic does happen lol.
I would really like to know how having deepfake porn of yourself has “no real world consequences” for the child being deepfaked. Kids will bully young girls for less.
“Physical” is carrying a lot of weight on the phrase “do not cause real world physical harm”.
He’s technically right that it would be hard to legislate consistently and there would be weird grey zones in doing so but when it comes to deepfakes of actual flesh and blood children which is what is being described here, this falls squarely into the not-at-all-grey area lmao. Its just pointless to bring that up. Laws being hard to enforce correctly isnt a reason to not have them inherently. Because there are things that should very obviously be off limits no matter what and deepfakes of actual flesh and blood children should obviously fall in that category.
Like I don’t even know that this dude is an acutal pedophile lmao my read here is that he’s a weird as fuck pendant that choses incredibly strange hills to die on and isn’t even right in applying the arguments he’s trying to apply. Baffling. Like he doesn’t even think this should be legal? He just thinks it should be illegal for a different reason? Except thats not even correct because the “defemation and libel” he cites IS ITSELF ABUSE OF A CHILD like god just thinking about how absurd these arguments are is blowing my brain away .
This is manipulative of him and a misuse of an argument people have used about a different situation. A trusted user here once pointed out correctly that lolicon should not be called CSAM because victims orgs who created that term have been very serious about making sure that term is used correctly to describe situations in which a child was actually abused. That doesn’t make lolicon morally correct to create or consume, just that its an incorrect use of an important term.
BUT THATS NOT THE ISSUE BEING DISCUSSED HERE. Making deepfakes of an actual flesh and blood child that actually exists is child abuse. The “defamation and libel” he describes is abusive, so its not incorrect to call it CSAM.
Its just weird pedentry and a fucking weird ass hill to die on lmao, in addition to not being correct.
WAIT HOLY SHIT ITS NOT EVEN DEFENDING LOLICON ITS FUCKING AI DEEPFAKES OF AN ACTUAL CHILD WHAT THE ABOSLUTE FUCK.
They should get into cool special interests like X-Men, Final Fantasy, Survivor, Digimon, Pro Wrestling
Not only is Ash 10, he remained 10 for 22 years lol.
Knew from the second I saw this thread there would be people here being confidently wrong about them being kids lol. Never fails.
The first part of my title lol (getting harassed by Gamergate chuds)
Mox <3
Lmao at the commentor saying “Yeah we know youre not a Spurs fan” to imply Corbyn is an antisemite when “Spurs fans are all jews” is actually (apparently???) an antisemitic stereotype.