And while the Greens are doing what they do best (opposing green development), the Labour government has already lifted the Tory ban on onshore windfarms.

This is odd, because Labour are the same as the Tories, as we all know, and the Greens are a radical new force. But in this case, Labour are doing the direct opposite of the Tories, while the Greens are doing the same things the Tories did! Most curious.

EDIT: Here’s the official government statement confirming this.

EDIT 2: And this isn’t all! Rachel Reeves is also planning to do more to make onshore wind simpler to build.

  • UrbonMaximus
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    He is opposed to a policy which has already been thoroughly consulted on.

    Wrong, I’m afraid it wasn’t. national grid consultation

    It seems like the pressure is working, because they agreed that the initial assessment wasn’t enough: “We are also consulting on the preliminary findings from our environmental studies and assessments as well as proposed mitigation for any potential impacts to the local environment, including animal habitats and the local landscape.”

    In any case the local campaigners want more scrutiny and consultation from a third party. Which is their right if we like it or not.

    • frankPodmore@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      As I said elsewhere, these endless consultations are a known blocking tactic. Nimby campaigners demand endless consultations but they are clearly acting in bad faith: they only accept the results when they agree with the nimby demands to build nothing. We have seen this over and over again. It is a big part of the reason we have a housing crisis and a stagnant economy. It’s scandalous that the Greens are now using their parliamentary platform to continue to act how they have in local government: blocking necessary green development.