• Flax
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    That article is both hilarious and awful at the same time. You are right though, who in their right mind would admit to having an issue. Although I think the difference here is that Huw Edwards never meant to actually view child porn, he even asked the guy not to send him any.

    Back to the topic though - is it possible to cure paedophilia? I thought it wasn’t yet known how one could change somebody’s sexual attraction to things/people

    • GreatAlbatrossOPMA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      That’s where it gets into the super-mega-tricky politics.
      You’ve got to advocate for helping to reform someone doing something harmful (diddling kids).
      While also defending not doing a similar thing to other people who are not causing harm (being gay).
      While a third group is trying to conflate the two, because they want them both to suffer.
      And a fourth group (unrepentant diddlers) try to conflate in the opposite direction to normalise their diddling.

      Absolute fucking minefield, so the upshot is people who could be helped, don’t get helped.

      • Flax
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Exactly what I’m thinking. If you could cure paedophilia (which would be a good thing) then you may be able to cure homosexuality (which could and would be abused quite a bit). Although it is worth mentioning that Huw Edwards wasn’t diddling, but I assume you were just talking about in general