• frazorth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    That’s not what I said. Their fundraising is dead because they don’t need to raise any more cash.

    They literally throw cash away each month. Without Googles dump truck money I am sure they could increase fundraising to raise what they actually need to operate. Not that they could increase fundraising to match Googles current contributions.

    • stinerman [Ohio]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think it’s fair to think that they could refocus their efforts on the browser if they didn’t have that large slush fund from Google. I don’t think “hey we don’t take Google money anymore” is going to lead to a lot of new donations, however.

      • frazorth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Completely agree that it will require effort. But considering there is literally no way for me to donate, the bar for improvement is stupidly low.

        What would be nice is that having a better feedback loop could encourage community engagement. Having proper profiles would be my request.

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      As I understand, their fundraising is dead / not used for Firefox, because covering costs with them is not considered viable.

      More specifically, they currently have around 200 million active users, according to this: https://data.firefox.com/dashboard/user-activity
      So, even if they somehow cut costs, they’ll still basically need all users to donate $2 per year. Or 1% of users to donate $200 per year. That’s just more than realistically comes in through donations…