RubberDuck@lemmy.world to UK Politics · 4 months ago‘I was frustrated’: The woman who told Labour it didn’t need to spend £28bn on green investmentwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up136arrow-down13
arrow-up133arrow-down1external-link‘I was frustrated’: The woman who told Labour it didn’t need to spend £28bn on green investmentwww.theguardian.comRubberDuck@lemmy.world to UK Politics · 4 months agomessage-square12fedilink
minus-squaremannycalaveralinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down7·4 months ago 28 billion will seem like a great bargain… but then it’ll cost trillions Are you expecting an inflation rate of 111% in the next five years? 😂
minus-squarebr3d@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·4 months agoThey mean it would cost more because the problem has become bigger and more complicated because it wasn’t addressed early
minus-squaremannycalaveralinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down4·4 months agoYes, that part was obvious. However hyperbolic misrepresentation doesn’t help this argument. 😉
minus-squarefutatorius@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 months agoThey’re expecting nonlinearities as climate systems are more destabilised.
minus-squaremannycalaveralinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down5·4 months agoMy friend… Do the maths. It’s not exactly difficult. 😂😂😂
Are you expecting an inflation rate of 111% in the next five years? 😂
They mean it would cost more because the problem has become bigger and more complicated because it wasn’t addressed early
Yes, that part was obvious.
However hyperbolic misrepresentation doesn’t help this argument. 😉
They’re expecting nonlinearities as climate systems are more destabilised.
deleted by creator
My friend… Do the maths. It’s not exactly difficult. 😂😂😂
deleted by creator