• BeardedGingerWonder
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 month ago

    It wouldn’t be fantastic, the UK and France can’t project the same kind of power the US does.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Well, true.

      But on the other hand, sanity from not being beholden to a demented child-raping fascist is a big bonus.

      • GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s not like the us would be out of Europe’s lives though, it would be even more obnoxious as there wouldn’t be any shared standards any more

    • Saleh@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      Is the US power projection at the long term benefit of the EU though? The consistent destabilization of the Middle East for instance brought more tension to Europe as people had to flee from the region. EU member states getting dragged into US wars didn’t help our image in the world either.

      When it comes to defense, UK and France have enough nukes for effective deterrent. The EU is also large enough to thwart aggression at its borders and buffer zones like countering the Russian invasion of Ukraine, if the EU chooses to develop and maintain a joint defense infrastructure. Unfortunately that was postponed instead of forwarded after Biden won in 2020 and EU politicians went back to the status quo.

      • Mihies@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yep, destabilization of Middle East is a big win for the enabler US against EU - they get influence and oil, EU gets migrant waves to deal with.

    • superkret@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      “Power projection” isn’t necessary for a strictly defensive alliance.
      The fact that a direct attack on one member counts as a direct attack on all members (some of which have nukes) is enough.

      • BeardedGingerWonder
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Unless you’re going to nuke an invading force then many of the smaller or less well equipped NATO member nations are going to rely on the power projection capabilities of the bigger militaries in the alliance, right?