There are things about the charity that need investigation but if it never said the proceeds of the book were going to charity (and I assume someone would have dug up evidence if it had) then that’s the family’s money.
Sounds like it’s under a separate company, so nothing to do with the charity. As long as they didn’t intentionally mislead (and it doesn’t appear to be the case) there doesn’t seem to be a problem here. Probably some people assuming the proceeds would go to the charity but nobody said they would.
That was my take: “I assumed it was going to charity and now feel cheated”. If it had said Simon the book or advertising someone would have found damning examples, but they don’t seem.to have.
There are things about the charity that need investigation but if it never said the proceeds of the book were going to charity (and I assume someone would have dug up evidence if it had) then that’s the family’s money.
Sounds like it’s under a separate company, so nothing to do with the charity. As long as they didn’t intentionally mislead (and it doesn’t appear to be the case) there doesn’t seem to be a problem here. Probably some people assuming the proceeds would go to the charity but nobody said they would.
That was my take: “I assumed it was going to charity and now feel cheated”. If it had said Simon the book or advertising someone would have found damning examples, but they don’t seem.to have.