I’ve seen a lot of posts on this site that are leaning into anti semetic tropes while criticizing Israel. I want to point it out so that folks can recognize it.

First, because I have to say it:

Israel is a colonial outpost of the United States. It was created by Britain and inherited by the US. The US gives Israel ~3,000,000,000 USD in aid every year. As a colony, it should be the goal of every socialist to destroy it, just as we seek the destruction of the US, Northern Ireland, South Korea, Canada, the Phillipine state, etc.

But! Israel is also a safe haven for Jews. This is seperable from the colonial nature of the state. Israel could have been created in Germany or Siberia or frankly Florida for that matter (in fact, annexing Florida to create a new state of Israel is what I mean when i refer to “the one state solution”). In many ways, the US with its civil rights act serves the same purpose, and in fact, most Jews live in the US.

Many of us had ancestors in Germany or Poland during the holocaust who did not stick around after the war. They saw Israel as their best shot at safety in the wake of the holocaust. Many Israelis are liberals, hoping to vote out Likud, stop supporting settlements, and negotiate palestinian statehood. These people are advocating half measures, sure, but they are not our enemies.

So I wanted to point out some anti-semetic tropes I’ve seen on this website and call them out so you can recognize them.

Conflating Jews in Israel with Zionists.

This can be done through omission. If you aren’t clear whether you’re talking about jews or a specific institution (for example, the I"D"F or the settlements or Likud), many people will read your statement as being about Jews. Be careful with the word “they”

erasing the ambivalent position of jews within colonialism / conflating jewishness with whiteness

The zionist entity is not a Jewish colonial project, but an Anglo colonial project. It was created by the British and now is funded by the US Americans. Jews are an oppressed minority whose oppression is leveraged against other oppressed peoples. Similarly to how the US uses Kurds to Balkanize Iraq or The Hmong to wage counterinsurgency in Laos, it’s uses Jews to destabilize the Levant.

Outside of the US, jews are largely understood as a racial group and oppressed on that basis. Especially in the Arab world where the Islamic hyper nationalism has gained ground in response to colonialism and been funded further by colonialists to their own ends (google “the safari club” or “Israel funds Hamas”)

Blood Libel

This one is the assertion that Jews are uniquely bloodthirsty / murder non Jewish children. The classic example of this myth that people are familiar with is Runplestiltskin.

It is true that the IDF under the direction of Likud and the US state is murdering many Gazans, the majority of whom are children. but! be careful to specify. When people talk about “jews” or “israelis” generally as perpetuating the murder of children, they are engaging in the blood libel trope. Again, be careful with the word “they” and specify which entities you’re talking about.

calling for ethnic cleansing

Okay, wtf ya’ll. It’s not jews as an ethnicity that are oppressing Palestinians, it is US imperial power. Jews have always lived in Palestine and the occupation only began in the 40s as part of a British initiative.

Jews will always be part of a palestinian state, and frankly need protections as ethnic and religious minorities. We do not seek the expulsion of Jews from Palestine, but their integration into it as citizens.

Jews are safe in the US not because its a colonial state but because of civil rights protections and generational wealth. If we can create civil rights protections in Palestine and a social safety net (ideally communism but I’ll settle for social democracy), then jews will be safe in Palestine.

Jewish control of America / protocols of the elders of zion

America controls Israel and not vice versa. APEC is not a cabal brainwashing otherwise Nobel Christian politicians. US politicians support Israel because they’re colonial politicians and Israel is our colony. APEC exists because lobbying is how power is exercised in the US, but if we had patronage instead, APEC’ functions would be carried our by a governor or an ambassador or whatever.

conclusion

Recognize the role of the US empire in Palestinian oppression. Recognize that jews are in an ambivalent racial category and are an oppressed people. Be specific when criticizing Israeli colonialism. Name who you’re criticizing, is it the settlements? The IDF? Likud? The US military Industrial Complex? Stop calling for ethnic cleansing of jews if you’ve been doing that. Don’t equate jewishness with whiteness / the Nazis. White people are white people, the US is the Nazis.

  • zed_proclaimer [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Recognize the role of the US empire in Palestinian oppression. Recognize that jews are in an ambivalent racial category and are an oppressed people. Be specific when criticizing Israeli colonialism. Name who you’re criticizing, is it the settlements? The IDF? Likud? The US military Industrial Complex? Stop calling for ethnic cleansing of jews if you’ve been doing that. Don’t equate jewishness with whiteness / the Nazis. White people are white people, the US is the Nazis.

    Why isn’t “Israel” on your list of OK to criticize groups? The colonialist state of Israel needs to be destroyed and wiped off the face of the earth, and this is not anti-semitic to say. I’ve not seen one person on this site blaming all jews for anything. Can you provide even a single example of this that wasn’t quickly removed by mods? Stop vague posting and concern trolling if you don’t have an explicit example, now is not the time to center the attention on yourself.

    • Vncredleader@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Well said. I agree with them when it comes to people saying “Jews”, but when it comes to Israel, any part of Israel, then condemnation is correct. Israel IS the settlements, the IDF, Likud, the MIC. It is the outcome of all of them and exists to carry out the MIC and Likud’s will, and uses settlements and the IDF to do so. Israeli Jews don’t get to use Jews writ large as a shield. They don’t get to claim the oppression of others while they colonize someone else’s land, and yes that means any Israeli citizen not actively opposed to israeli ie Neturei Karta.

      Israeli also IS a white supremacist state, look no further than the treatment of Ethiopian Jews. Israel has accepted itself as white and framed itself against Arabs and other people of color. It is flat out not an ambivalent racial category. Jewish is, Israeli is not.

      Quoting from BE’s video

      i object to people singling out zionism not for the reasons that usually state like anti-semitism etc but because it’s just bog standard settler colonialism it still forms a wider part of settler colonialism it’s still a set of actions that are that easily identifiable as settler colonialism

  • SexMachineStalin [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “Antisemite” is basically another word for “whataboutism”. Also actual anti-semites get the barbara-pit too

    And since the Apartheid in South Africa ended 30 years ago, accusing anyone critical of apartheid rule of being a communist sympathizer grew out of fashion, so there was an “urgent” need to find a new label

    say the line, bart

    Semi-joking aside, I know where to not point the finger at. On the contrary also, it’s the people who make this accusation who themselves let it slip. The irony isn’t lost when the likes of Miko Peled and Ronnie Kasrils, along with groups such as SAJFP, JVP and B’tselem consistently get pelted with the “antisemite” accusations on the regular.

      • Hexbear2 [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        bad faith

        Yes. 100%.

        Concern Trolling; False assumptions based on lack of foundation; Lib shit moral grandstanding; probably propaganda.

      • Vncredleader@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Instead of a callout to nothing in particular, report specific comments or give examples. Cause I’ve seen nothing of the sort here

      • hotcouchguy [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think that through no fault of the left, this are a lot of hidden dangers to be aware of.

        First, there are actual antisemites around. I expect there’s not many on hexbear, but we can’t let our guard down.

        Next, fascists use so many tropes and dogwhistles and euphemisms that one can easily stumble into using one accidentally. And even when avoiding those, one can easily be misinterpreted by people who are understandably on alert. And we can also be intentionally misrepresented by zionists or imperialists or others acting in bad faith.

        In this context, a post like yours could be read as an accusation or a slander or an attempt to start conflict. I don’t think that’s your intention and I think you were clear in your writing so it would be hard to read it that way. But most of us have experienced a lot of bad faith accusations this week (often from people with power over us) so we’re on guard for that as well.

  • ilyenkov [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Many Israelis are liberals, hoping to vote out Likud, stop supporting settlements, and negotiate palestinian statehood. These people are advocating half measures, sure, but they are not our enemies.

    Maybe they aren’t your enemies, but they’re mine. Fuck off with this lib bullshit. It’s not only rge recent settlements in, eg the West Bank, that are settlements, ALL Zionists in Palestine are settlers, even those who are heckin wholesome liberals who think Palestinians can have a little of their stolen land back. Your post is soft Zionist apologia, and I think it’s gross

    • Nagarjuna [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m distinguishing between enemies and political opponents. It’s the difference between socialist majority in DSA (our political opponents) and the democrats (our enemies)

      • Stoatmilk [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The moderates within the oppressing group are a critical part of it with their own specific parts in the functioning of the oppression, and oppression as a whole is our enemy. Of course, we shouldn’t dehumanize them, but we also shouldn’t fool ourselves into thinking they are somehow neutral.

    • doccitrus@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Israel is in fact among the most dangerous places, if not the most dangerous place, in the world to be Jewish, precisely because of the violence inherent in settler colonialism.

      The idea that Israel serves as a safe haven for Jews has always played a justificatory role in Zionism but it has never been true.

  • I’m going to quibble with your claim that Israel is a safe haven for Jews. This attack should have ended this claim forever. There is no way Jewish people are safer in Israel than they would be in the us, Canada, the uk, France, Germany, etc.

    Secondly, why do Jews need a homeland to be safe? No other group that has been attacked through history ever has been supported in creating an ethnostate in order to protect them. Where is the demand for Roma to have a state to protect that from racism in Europe? Where are the calls to give the descendants of enslaved Africans to be given a state they can control in order to be protected?

    Antisemitism is a real problem, and as leftists we must always call it out just as we do for any other form of oppression. I will continue to my best at this as well, and pretty much agree with the specific arguments you make in the rest of your post

    • MF_COOM [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Where are the calls to give the descendants of enslaved Africans to be given a state they can control in order to be protected?

      Isn’t that what Liberia is?

      • StalinwasaGryffindor [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Liberia has the exact same problem as Israel. There were already people living there. To be done correctly I think descendants of enslaved Africans would deserve a homeland carved out of the US, Brazil, etc. with the caveat that indigenous peoples of those regions would also have full rights in these hypothetical countries

        Edit: this would be similar to the idea that Israel should have been carved out of Germany/Austria but more complicated due the existence of righteous and just indigenous struggles in the americas and Caribbean

        • Redcuban1959 [any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It ended horrible for Liberia. The Americo-Liberian attacked and segregated the natives, they ran the country as a one-party state until 1980’s. When the USA decided to fund a coup, they helped a radical right-wing native military goverment be established that caused more and more ethnical problems.

          Just because the Americo-Liberian were starting to have diplomatic relations with the Soviet Union, ended their one-party system, eased the segregation on the natives and they had started to support Palestine.

    • Nagarjuna [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think you’re right that Israel is factually not safe. Although, the attacks were mostly against forward settlements and not like, Tel Aviv (although the bombing obviously changes that). I think I should have differentiated more strongly between the motivations of apolitical and left wing Jews who moved to Israel after the holocaust and the reality of Israel not actually being safe. Thank you for your quibble.

      I want to clarify one thing though. in my post, I’m critical of the idea that an ethnostate is the best way to secure Jewish liberation. My proposed solution was one secular state with civil rights protections for religious minorities.

  • Israel is also a safe haven for Jews

    Maybe some specific strands of Jewish people. As long as they are white or European or American or however you wanna categorise them. Ethiopian jews are ghettoised and forcibly sterilised.

    • Bloobish [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Legit my fav question to ask people that make this statement conflating Israel with the entirety of Jewish peoples (a exceedingly diverse grouping of various ethnic and religiously distinct traditions/peoples). Also there’s the fact that Israel has a lowkey hate towards Eastern European ethnic Jews as well as also despising the use of yiddish language (legit goal of the Israeli state to ensure yiddish was never spoken). Also yeah never forget what happened to the Jewish ethiopeans that moved to Israel as refugees.

  • StellarTabi [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’ve seen a lot of posts on this site that are leaning into anti semitic tropes while criticizing Israel.

    This is a pretty strong claim to make without presenting any evidence. In fact, is an extremely common thing reactionaries will say, and if any evidence is eventually presented, 99% it’s something inanely unoffensive like a lot of words for “free parking” or “plz no murder”.

    For anyone who choose to read my comment but not the rest of OP’s post, the rest of OP’s post does have good points about not using terms that can be interpreted as antisemitic dog-whistles.

    IMO rephrasing this as an educational PSA instead an accusation would be better.

  • Cummunism [they/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Conclusion: “blame America, Israel didn’t do nothing at all”

    or maybe it’s both. Kinda like in Ukraine, America is to blame and so is Ukraine. But Ukraine isn’t a religion based ethnostate so it’s not a hate crime to criticize them fortunately. The need to suddenly be verrrrry specific with words because Israel are a nation of mostly Jewish people(and mostly settlers) is hilarious. Israel sure did find the loop hole. Israel has sovereignty, they can choose to not be a vassal state at any time they choose.

    Don’t equate jewishness with the Nazis

    bugs-no

    simply the amount of segregation and police checkpoints for Arabs earns them that comparison. the IDF must say “papers please” so many times each day.

    • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The need to suddenly be verrrrry specific with words

      it’s no more effort than emphasizing that the islamic state or whatever sect du jour don’t represent ‘muslims’, or the actions of any muslim-majority nation for that matter.

      • Vncredleader@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        For sure, but they conflate Israelis with diasporic Jews quite a bit. As well as differentiating the IDF from Likud as if they and frankly all settlers can be.

  • Romeo [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    To be Jewish is fine.

    To be a Zionist is to be a fascist of the same order as those that pursued Lebensraum and Manifest Destiny. They are villains and should never feel safe wherever they go.

    P.S.

    It’s a pretty easy distinction to make in that you (probably) don’t choose to be Jewish but you do choose to be a Zionist. A Jewish Zionist is awful not because of their being Jewish but because of their goals of ethnic cleansing and militaristic expansionism under the guise of “reclaiming a historic/prophesized homeland”; a non-Jewish Zionist is a Fascist using religion/past persecution/etc. to launder their bloodlust.

  • abc [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Have there been any actual calls for ethnic cleansing or assertions of blood libel by Hexbears??? I want to say the most egregious thing I’ve seen posted by Hexbears is ‘Isreal’ instead of ‘Israel’. Not saying it couldn’t or didn’t happen - just curious because I’d expect better from the average poster on here.

    • Nagarjuna [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah, there have. I saw one person get up voted for saying that decolonizing Palestine required ethnic cleansing. I saw another say that Jews need to “pack up and leave” Israel. Both upvoted. It’s not the mainstream but it’s out there.

      More common though is vague language that probably applies to settlers / likud or whoever but could reasonably be interpreted to mean “jews” by someone not on the same page as the hexbear mainstream.

      • settlers gotta be kicked out of the last 40 years of settlements probably, like the french were expelled from viet nam.

        i dunno if that’s “ethnic cleansing” but i’m sure reactionaries would try to call it such regardless

      • Tony! Toni! Toné! ☑️@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        …not on the same page as the hexbear mainstream

        This needs to be said again. I wish we had a way of onboarding new users about what hexbearism means as a political ideology.

  • 666PeaceKeepaGirl [any, she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just to preface, I do think that we can benefit from being more aware of anti-semetic tropes. Many fascist dogwhistles do disguise themselves in language and symbolism that appears harmless or even resembles valid critique, such that even well-meaning people can reference them by mistake. I think of Corbyn for instance, nobody ought to doubt his sincerity but clearly he made a few unforced errors here or there that helped feed Labour antisemitism hysteria.

    So I’m all for, here’s some common anti-Semitic tropes, now you know so you can avoid them. And in particular, I would say “Be specific… Name who you’re criticizing” is pretty solid advice. With that said: I do think there’s some here that’s a little problematic, and nobody else has quite articulated what I’m feeling so let me put this out here:

    First, many have mentioned the timing of this post at a moment of serious crisis as not feeling right. I want to emphasize the issue isn’t so much that it’s “tone-policing,” but rather, that it plays into colonialist narratives. Personally I’m fine with having to tread carefully around sensitive topics, but I’m decidedly not fine with the pervasiveness of the right-wing narrative that the Palestine liberation movement and even the Left as a whole is somehow intrinsically antisemitic. And when you point vaguely to “a lot of posts … leaning into anti-Semitic tropes” without contextualizing who or what posts or how they were received by the community, that does sound a bit like a repackaging of this “left/Palestine/BDS antisemitic” narrative, which has been used as a major political cudgel to resist change to the status quo.

    Now, in another moment, some self-crit in how we approach dismantling this narrative might be warranted, even if outsiders were to take it as a tacit admission of a problem. But at the moment of truth where you’ve got 500 dead in a hospital airstrike and troops lining up for a ground invasion, the “Left antisemitism issue” is really not the discussion we want to be having. (It is worth noting, to OP’s credit, discussions of issues internal to the Left are, regardless of situation, much, much more appropriate on a platform like Hexbear where those discussions will mostly remain internal to the Left, than they would be on a platform where we’re engaging with a broader public to be swayed such as :reddit-logo: .)

    That’s really the main issue here, but as to a couple of the more specific gripes:

    ~“Conflating Jews in Israel…” - More or less agree with OP’s points here, but I do think it is worth recognizing that this is, in a real sense, a religious sectarian conflict. I suppose you could say it’s superstructural, but when Israel legally defines itself as a state for Jews and only Jews, that’s where they (the Israeli state) are looking to draw the lines, and that’s what we have to combat. In other words, no, this is not a problem with Jews or Judaism, but also: Israel cannot be a Jewish state.

    ~“calling for ethnic cleansing” - OP says “Jews have always lived [there],” but this is imho minimizing just how much of the population is part of or descended from the colonial project. Wikipedia is telling me the Israeli Jewish population went from <100k in 1915, to over a million by 1949, to nearly 5 million at the turn of the century, and over 6.5 million today. That’s not organic population growth, that’s a massive influx of people who came in and took land where there were already other people.

    Now, I agree that full-out sending away all the Israeli Jews is not and should not be on the table. Not only do some have claims predating the settler influx, but I imagine even many of the settlers and their descendants don’t have much place else they can go and still ought to be treated humanely. That said, I think we ought to be realistic and recognize that the Palestinians have been forced from their homes, in some cases quite recently, and in the case of Gaza forced into a tiny little area, very densely populated and lacking basic infrastructure. If we’re going to have justice, it’s not going to come without a lot of reparations and frankly probably some degree of land back and right to return. The more recent and more wealthy of the settlers probably should leave.

    ~“Jewish control of America” - OP says “America controls Israel and not vice-versa”… it’s really more of a two-way street. Israel and AIPAC/Israel lobby just very much do have serious sway over American politicians and honestly Western politicians more generally. Israel is an independent state and functions as one, at times annoying people in Washington who want them to do their ethnic cleansing a little more quietly. That said, it also goes without saying that Israel’s prosperity is dependent on some measure of servitude to American geopolitical interests, and that framing Israeli influence as “Jewish control” is very much :haram: .

    That’s all I got. Hadn’t planned for this to be such an effortpost but :shrug-outta-hecks:

    • Vncredleader@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      AHHHH I lost my comment just by scrolling down.

      whatever, I was saying you and Maoo did a good job explaining the critiques of the post. More specifically I was saying the biggest problem is the apologia for Israeli liberals. Even a two state solution would mean removal of settlers from the '47 borders. Most significant though is that OP conflates Israelis with Jews even if they don’t mean to. An Israeli in Israel being the target of anti-colonial violence is not the same as the Tree of Life Synagogue victims full stop.

      One example is someone living as the ruling race in an ethnostate being targeted because they are the oppressor, the other are victims of antisemitism. Israelis, especially in Israel and involved in politics or settlements do not get to be “an ambivalent racial category and an oppressed people” they are oppressors and are literally in a country in which they are first class citizens. Once you move to Israel the game changes, you don’t get to use the suffering of the diaspora as a shield. If you colonize another country with an openly racial supremacist and white supremacist/eurocentric goal, you ARE part of white supremacy and genocide.

      You can find a moral difference in attacking Likud vs a liberal Israeli, but at the end of the day them being attacked by Palestinians is linked inexorably to them being zionists, literally settlers in an ethnostate with laws that make Palestinians lesser than them. I agree with the OP on a lot of what they are saying, but things like that are defenses of zionism and are equating Jewishness with Zionism intended or not. They conflate saying Israelis are killing Gazans with saying “Jews are killing Gazans” in the same breath as telling people to be careful about specifying who they mean. Implying, or arguably just stating that Israelis and Jews are equally incorrect ways to talk refer to those committing massacres. NO, saying “jews” are doing it is incorrect and antisemitic, saying Israelis are is literally just the truth. Same reason we say “Americans killed Iraqis” even if yeah every individual American is not killing an Iraqi personally.

      It is true that the IDF under the direction of Likud and the US state is murdering many Gazans, the majority of whom are children. but! be careful to specify. When people talk about “jews” or “israelis” generally as perpetuating the murder of children, they are engaging in the blood libel trope. Again, be careful with the word “they” and specify which entities you’re talking about.

      This is just conflating Israeli and Jew and my problem with it is not tone-policing, but rather that it itself falls into an antisemitic conflation of the two, and importantly portrays the IDF as outside of Likud and the US. They are going at great lengths to distance Israelis and even the literal members of the Israeli death squads from the violence they represent and commit. That is actually offensive and gross.

      • LeninWeave [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        This is just conflating Israeli and Jew and my problem with it is not tone-policing, but rather that it itself falls into an antisemitic conflation of the two, and importantly portrays the IDF as outside of Likud and the US. They are going at great lengths to distance Israelis and even the literal members of the Israeli death squads from the violence they represent and commit. That is actually offensive and gross.

        GOOD post. OP makes some good points, but they could have been made without settler apologia, IDF apologia, and (ironically, and clearly unintentionally) antisemitism. Saying that it’s blood libel to say “Israelis are murdering Palestinians” is absolutely ridiculous, and as you said implies that “Jews” = “Israelis” and criticisms of Israel are antisemitic.

        As a note, even if you were to say “Jews”, it wouldn’t be blood libel. Absolutely antisemitic, but not blood libel. Blood libel is specifically about accusing Jews of using the blood of children in rituals. You can expand that definition reasonably to include a lot of accusations about using the blood of children, but it’s clearly not applicable here. It’s a specific antisemitic trope with a specific meaning and history, and it’s probably counterproductive to stick the label on every antisemitic statement involving accusations of violence.

        • Vncredleader@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m rewatching BE’s video on settler colonialism and this comment sums up the error in OP’s post so well

          this is not a problem of the israeli right, this is not a problem of benjamin netanyahu, this is not a problem of likud, this is not a problem of religious fanatics, this is a problem of the very nature of the israeli state from its very origins it has always been like this it is probably always going to be like this

          And yeah people use blood libel as just “accusing a Jew of killing children” or “accusing Jews of killing children” when it is a far more pernicious and specific conspiracy theory rooted in European Christians.

  • Tachanka [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’ve seen a lot of posts on this site that are leaning into anti semetic tropes while criticizing Israel. I want to point it out so that folks can recognize it.

    You should take the opportunity to give examples of those posts and call them out directly by name and date of registration. Because I can’t imagine anyone leaning into anti-semitic tropes is anything but a reactionary wrecker. I don’t think you would accuse anyone of being anti-semitic in bad faith but it’s important to remember that this is the number one technique of the ultranationalist lobbyists of Israel when it comes to silencing or slandering pro-palestinian voices. And it’s a very good technique on their part because of the very grim and important history of antisemitism, mostly coming from the very nations funding Israeli settler-colonialism in Palestine.

    Israel is a colonial outpost of the United States. It was created by Britain and inherited by the US. The US gives Israel ~3,000,000,000 USD in aid every year. As a colony, it should be the goal of every socialist to destroy it, just as we seek the destruction of the US, Northern Ireland, South Korea, Canada, the Phillipine state, etc.

    And those same lobbyists would call you anti-semitic for proposing the destruction of the Israeli settler-colony. So it’s important to remember that the word “anti-semitic” is currently undergoing a semantic decomposition, a “Boy Who Cried Wolf” effect, where the neolib and neocon reactionaries of the imperial core are rendering the word utterly meaningless through their deceptive rhetoric. one of the unfortunate side effects of this, is that actual antisemitic nazis are going to see an opportunity to take advantage of the outpouring of support for Palestinians, and use it to worm their way into mainstream political discourse. This is why we should name these posts and quote them directly, rather than vaguely gesturing that they exist, so that these accounts can get take care and removed from our platform which has never in any way supported anti-semitism.

    in fact, annexing Florida to create a new state of Israel is what I mean when i refer to “the one state solution”

    Give Florida back to the Seminoles and Miccosukee and other remaining First Nations. soviet-huff

    Conflating Jews in Israel with Zionists.

    Jewish control of America / protocols of the elders of zion

    Please call out and report these posts. These should be grounds for automatic bans.

    • LeninWeave [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Conflating Jews in Israel with Zionists.

      Unfortunately, he does it in this very post.

      When people talk about “jews” or “israelis” generally as perpetuating the murder of children, they are engaging in the blood libel trope.

      Those two statements (with “jews” vs with “israelis”) are in no way the same. The first is antisemitism, the second is objective fact and the policy of the Israeli state. To conflate the two is antisemitic, and also plays into Israeli propaganda that they are the representatives of Jews and Judaism.

    • edge [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Kicking out settlers isn’t ethnic cleansing. Did Haitians ethnically cleanse Haiti of French people? Was kicking German settlers out of Poland (that part that was already Poland before the war) ethnic cleansing?

      • ilyenkov [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly.

        It’s fucking sad that even people on this site are doing the whole “but if the colonized people liberate themselves, what’s gonna happen to the poor smol bean colonizers???” deal.

        • a_blanqui_slate [none/use name, any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The colonizers are a nuclear weapon state; if your take peaceful and equal coexistence of the colonizers and indigenous people off the table, the solutions you’re left with are ‘more powerful colonizer state dissolves away through the power of magical thinking’ or ‘complete indigenous genocide’, neither of which terribly appeal me.

          • ilyenkov [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            “Peaceful and equal coexistence of the colonizers and indigenous people” is the fucking magical thinking, jfc. That’s the fucking impossible, blackpilled, nihilism take.

            I’m more a fan of the colonizers state dissolves through the power of extreme violence personally. Might as well fucking give up on communism now if we’re gonna let the nuclear blackmail hold us back.