• scrchngwsl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Exactly, if their claims were processed faster and more competently (i.e. with very low likelihood of successful appeal), then the ones who are not genuine asylum seekers can be deported legally and quickly, which is surely a greater deterrent than the Rwanda scheme.

    Am I just a naive lefty? What am I missing?

      • Echo Dot
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        6 months ago

        A competent government is not actually a hard thing to achieve. The problem is you’re assuming that the Conservatives are just incompetent, and while a great deal of them are, the issue is far more that they just don’t want to process the asylums. They want this to be a problem, that way they can rail against the evil terrible foreign people which is what they think their voter base wants.

        This is a Conservative manufactured problem. They have no interest in processing asylums quickly, being slow and ineffective is the intention. It’s not a failing.

        • TWeaK
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          It’s more than that in the UK, unfortunately. Suella Braverman’s father ran British concentration camps in Kenya, she’s trying to restart the family business (funded entirely by the taxpayer), the reason they haven’t been processing people is simply so they have enough occupants for their new camps.

    • triplenadir@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      if you think that the UK government has a right to try and determine if an asylum claim is “genuine” and if making deportation more efficient is a goal then “naïve” maybe, “lefty” not by any meaningful standard