A man in a mask is out to get you; that’s the basic drill, and horror fans know it – they love the drill, they worship the drill, they have an endless, insatiable appetite for the drill. But that doesn’t mean that you can’t appreciate innovative variations on the premise: an original choice of weapon, perhaps, or particularly haunting motivation, or indeed a memorable mask. Chris Nash’s low-budget slasher qualifies as one of the more interesting formal variations; the weapons are not unusual (hooks feature prominently), the motivation is fairly standard (a Jason-style past wrong), and a fun but not that outlandish mask (a vintage firefighter’s mask). But it’s the way in which the movie is filmed that sets it apart.

The visual grammar and technique throughout is a complete contrast to almost everything you might expect. Where Halloween’s iconic score followed Michael Myers wherever he went, In a Violent Nature is almost devoid of music; set almost entirely outdoors in a national park, you can hear birds tweeting and not much else. The film is fond of a static camera too, with long, locked-off wide shots and slow pans replacing the standard roving or hectic horror visuals. Nash doesn’t use editing or framing to try to hide the killer; you can see him coming a mile off, often in daylight. Horror is a genre with strong heavy metal connections, but this is the acoustic, unplugged cover version: it hits all the same beats in the melody, but without the power chords.

What In a Violent Nature does have is quality gore effects. There is one particular moment that would go straight into any list of most memorable horror-movie kill shots.

  • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝OPMA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    22 days ago

    I enjoyed it for the different take on slasher films. I may not be rushing back to watch it but I’m glad I did.

    • eezeebee@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 days ago

      Pretty much my take as well. I like how they set the mood with the long walking shots.

      • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝OPMA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 days ago

        Indeed it brought home how stuff between the kills is really just filler but also those quiet moments really contrast well with the outbreaks of ultraviolence.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    22 days ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    But that doesn’t mean that you can’t appreciate innovative variations on the premise: an original choice of weapon, perhaps, or particularly haunting motivation, or indeed a memorable mask.

    Chris Nash’s low-budget slasher qualifies as one of the more interesting formal variations; the weapons are not unusual (hooks feature prominently), the motivation is fairly standard (a Jason-style past wrong), and a fun but not that outlandish mask (a vintage firefighter’s mask).

    Where Halloween’s iconic score followed Michael Myers wherever he went, In a Violent Nature is almost devoid of music; set almost entirely outdoors in a national park, you can hear birds tweeting and not much else.

    The film is fond of a static camera too, with long, locked-off wide shots and slow pans replacing the standard roving or hectic horror visuals.

    Horror is a genre with strong heavy metal connections, but this is the acoustic, unplugged cover version: it hits all the same beats in the melody, but without the power chords.

    Gruesome and disgusting, yes, but not scary; if you’re looking to get your nerves actively shredded, you might have to seek out other men in masks to accept that particular mission.


    The original article contains 363 words, the summary contains 193 words. Saved 47%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!