Kevin Smith has proven to have staying power in the world of film-making whether his films reach large audiences or not. However, one of his least-discussed films came about during a period of his career most movie-goers would consider a “slump,” but Tusk itself would suggest that it certainly wasn’t a creative slump. Holding just a 46% Critics Tomatometer score on Rotten Tomatoes – and an even worse 36% audience score – Tusk is one of Smith’s lower-rated outings.

Regardless, Tusk offers a genuinely fascinating look into the work of a primarily comic director entering an entirely new genre, and it should be viewed as a success as far as creativity goes. While there are a few very jarring elements included in the film, it still holds up far better a decade after its release than it did for audiences in 2014. Becoming something of a cult favorite ten years later, Tusk remains an underappreciated film by a director who appreciates the nuances of film far more than a corner of the general audience gives him credit.

  • Gerudo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    I went in thinking it’d be stupid B-Movie material. I was surprised at how good of a body horror flick it was. Super uncomfortable to watch for me, and I’m pretty jaded to a lot of horror movies.

    • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      I thought Tusk was a fun movie. I was surprised after watching it that people don’t like it.

      I mean, just the entire first conversation in the old guys living room when they meet is worth watching the movie for.

    • UKFilmNerdM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I personally think the whole RT system is awful. Why have a film prejudged by other people? Try watching it yourself and making up your own mind. Remember, you can stop a film if you’re not enjoying it.

      It doesn’t help that some fandoms like to review bomb which only makes matters worse.

      • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝OPMA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        RT has got itself stuck with the Rotten/Fresh schtick and it is too easily gamed. IMDb’s is more useful as a guide but, if a film sounds interesting, I’ll give it a shot and make my own mind up as there may be some redeeming feature that wins me round that might not necessarily work for other people.

  • Lifecoach5000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is one of those movies where I like to think in opened minded enough to see, but the premise seems so disturbing I just seriously doubt I ever will. Filed it under “The Human Centipede” or anything like that. No thanks.

    • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝OPMA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s not as cruel as Human Centipede and the sheer outlandish nature of the horror takes a bit of the sting away, but it isn’t for everyone.

  • sentientity@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I have not seen this movie because I think parts of it would be a bit much for me. But every time i hear about it I am like, damn, what a concept. I’m surprised people weren’t as hyped about it when it came out.