• LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Actually it’s the only thing that’s relevant. In your opinion legal = good and well-behaved=good, but not in mine.

    If a system like ours denies change and justice, then it doesn’t deserve people cowtowing before it.

    Real justice is about the why, and the broader context as much as it is about the what. A ransomware gang in Russia stealing from grandma is obviously not the same as a single mother stealing formula to feed her child. By your logic If the mother is upset and doesn’t think highly of the system, she gets a stricter sentence. Needless to say - this is absurd.

    I feel like this is morality 101, no offense. I doubt you actually believe that context shouldn’t matter, but that’s how it comes off.

    Needless to say, I think the sentencing should take into account not how you ‘conducted yourself’ but why you did what you did. I’ll agree that we disagree.

    • Echo Dot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      No it’s not my opinion. Your problem is that you think that everyone is fighting you, well they are not, we’re just pointing out that personal beliefs are not the same as legal truth. I just don’t like disingenuous people who seem to think that because you want something to be the case it actually is the case.

      Whether I like the law or not or whether you like the law or not isn’t relevant. You can’t break the law and expect anything other than prison time and fines, just because you think you have some moral authority. It’s not my problem if you don’t like it.

      • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        You’re missing the point. Whether the punishment was fair based on the law isn’t the same as the punishment being fair period.