• Schal330@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m personally not a fan of adding another ~2 hours onto my work days just to get a 3 day weekend. I feel like I would lose my time in the afternoon to wind down. I would much prefer to cut down to a 4 day week and work less hours with the same pay, but most companies are not going to do that.

    • Noit@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      Based on the article it’s still going to be something you have to request, so you should still be able to have your current setup unless your company gets so many requests it decides to standardise on 4long instead of 5.

    • USNWoodwork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      We’ve been doing 4x days at 9 hours, with an 8 hour Friday, and then taking every other Friday off.

      It’s still 40 hours but it’s something at least. I’d love to get down to 32 hours a week but I don’t want my pay to suffer. The Brits or the EU would have to do it first before the rest of the world might even think about trying it.

    • ScreamingFirehawk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Full time where I work is 37 hours a week with a 5 hour Friday. I’ve asked for a 4 day week by splitting those 5 hours over the other 4 days but have been refused. This seems to be about giving workers the right to request this arrangement, it shouldn’t force anyone to do it if they are happier sticking with their current 5 day week.

    • futatorius@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’ve been doing 4-long for about five years. If required, I’ll do work on Fridays, and some aspects of my job require occasional unsocial hours. For me, it’s a good arrangement. Ideally, people will have choices and won’t be coerced into a single working pattern.