108cm is squarely within the range of dwarfism so, as a minority, I wouldn’t be surprised if the data the user is searching for is scarce or missing altogether.
Hence the result pictured.
That said, the person searching this could have just made a typo for 180cm, which is much more common.
Why am I analysing the meme? Who knows.
Well overthinking things is generally quite fun, at least until it’s not.
Your weight is positive? Aren’t you ashamed to go out of the house with such a body
The fatso didn’t leave the house, but ate it from whithin.
Checks out.
Pff, you youngsters and your high tech.
Damn, better watch your diet extra carefully on holidays too, that’s a very tight window.
This week on Extreme weight loss
All my life i thought i was underweight
This post says i am in the healthy weight range(ignore the height) and people cant lie on the internet
Have you tried, you know, just not existing?
Not terribly surprising that the algorithm fails for dwarfs.
The latter is just an unsigned int that got a little too excited
The first zero is missing the units.
For comparison, Peter Dinklage is 135cm, Joe C (hype man for Kid Rock) was 114cm, and Verne Troyer was 81cm.
Somehow I’m not surprised the tallest one is the must successful
