• superkret@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    106
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    In the late 90s and very early 00’s you could google yahoo song names and get a downloadable mp3 link as one of the first results.
    Cause search engines simply showed websites that contained your search terms, without filtering and AI algorithms.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yep, too much of search engines today is people pushing SEO crap to rise in rankings and the businesses “protecting” users by delisting tons of sites that Google/Yahoo or who-the-fuck-ever has decided are “bad.” The number of times legitimate sites get swept up in that bullshit is too damn high.

    • Microw@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      Having no filtering certainly had its pros and cons, considering how much traumatizing shit google would throw at me as a child lol

  • aramis87@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    2 months ago

    omg, speed, why has no one said ‘speed’ yet? An hour-long tv show was 350mb, and it took three days to download.

      • BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Wow multi-terabyte in minutes! There are not many ISPs delivering 100Gbps and even fewer are delivering 1000Gbps.

        Unless you live on top of a data center.

  • Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    2 months ago

    In the aughts, pirates bay felt like the library of Congress. If a single commenter on a B tier forum saw it in a guy’s basement in the mid 80’s there was a sure bet at least 3 people were seeding it and one of them had great upload. If it wasn’t there, you had a dozen different sites with their own dedicated fans posting everything you could ever want.

    Now it’s maybe 6 sites, they all have the exact same listings, and the only things with seeds came out in the last year of two. It’s like seeing your local library after a fire.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Private trackers.

      Cinemageddon, for example, has lots of seeds on almost any worthless shitty B-movie you can think of going back to the early days of film.

      Source: 16 years on CG

      • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        I can never get a CG invite, personally, I’ve basically given up except for that offer in my bio to eternally curse your enemies for one (still standing btw).

        Unfortunately they never do sign ups, open or interviewed, and even if they did interview I’m only on IPT, which nobody takes as proof lmao. I mostly use usenet these days unfortunately, but at least it does have it’s benefits, DrunkenSlug accts are easier to come by and it is faster, and they have many things, but unfortunately lack B movies and other stuff I’m really into, but at least there’s IPT, slsk, yt-dl and internetarchive for some of those.

  • Glide@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    2 months ago

    It might be boring and obvious, but the speeds.

    I used to have to plan ahead, set overnight downloads, very consciously and actively manage data rates and in general never plan around getting something. Today, I can get basically ANYTHING in less than an hour on FiOp. Most things, 5-10 minutes. Transfer rate has outscaled data size, and it’s fantastic.

  • forgotmylastusername@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    People still gloat about piracy being a hydra where you cut off one head and more pop up. Except it isn’t any where close to that. Probably hasn’t been in at least 10-15 years. Piracy has been gradually chipped away at. People don’t seem to want to admit that. As if that would be siding with anti-piracy or something.

    In its heyday the catalogues of content was immense in breadth and depth. Just about any obscure thing could be found. These days even popular TV shows become more difficult to come by even a short while after the episode has been released. Unless you have access to more private parts of the web then you’re left trying to source some low quality trash tier download.

    Which brings me to the next point. Piracy used to be about providing the best possible quality. With popularity the quality got watered down. Opportunists came in trying to monetize it which drew the attention of authorities. Which drew the attention more opportunists which drew the attention of authorities. It snowballed.

    What piracy used to be was the spirit of the original internet. It was the library not just a library but the library of humanity. People catalogued and shared because that’s what librarians do.

    If I had the power I’d take away its popularity. Make it obscure again. It was better when it was ruled by snobs and autistic perfectionists.

    • riodoro1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      This. TPB was almost a trust worthy site in 2010’s. They had ads for penis enlargement and domains changed constantly, but it was so easy to find everything there. Now it’s hard to find a mirror that will let you click a magnet link and most of the time the torrents are dead.

    • eating3645@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      Sounds like you should get involved with PTs, they’d be right up your alley. The spirit is alive and well.

    • Corroded@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Piracy used to be about providing the best possible quality. With popularity the quality got watered down.

      Do you think that has to do with popularity though or a shifting attitude towards piracy?

      I feel like there’s a lot of people who treat it like they would with streaming. Downloading the newest episode or season of a show and deleting it almost immediately. They don’t feel the need to store it for later.

      People do keep stuff might be limited by their storage. A 1TB portable HDD can be great but if you are downloading entire shows it can devour it pretty quickly.

      Either way I feel like a lot of people aren’t concerned about quality. They care about having immediate access to it.

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 months ago

    If I had the power today I’d bring back services that were shamed into actually providing a reasonably priced service that offers good value.

    I don’t like pirating, I’d rather pay a fair price for services since I want those services to continue but I’m not fucking paying 15/month to watch a single show I’d enjoy.

  • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 months ago

    I used to pirate games because there was no legal digital distribution. The pirate version I could get faster and wouldn’t hassle me to put the right disk in the drive before I could play.

    Then digital distribution got good, DRM got less obnoxious, and malware got meaner.

    I used to pirate music for similar reasons.

    I didn’t pirate video because the files were too large, and around the time bandwidth caught up, Netflix got good. Now digital video distribution is awful so I pirate video until they solve the fractured storefront problem.

  • tankplanker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 months ago

    Early eights it was disk and tape trading, mostly tape trading in the UK. Was a way more social activity.

    Late 80s and early 90s, it was all disk, and you really needed a connected friend who could get the menu disks (custom pirated compilation disks). These were often super hoarded, only traded for a lot of games, like certain private trackers today.

    Very early web stuff was all usenet and ftp servers, often hosted at a university. If you knew where to look, anything was accessible.

    Early 2000s was a golden period of easy access. It would be slow, and the quality would often be low if it was a video or mp3. It’s gotten harder to find the obscure stuff as time has gone on. I

    t’s like the scene only remembers out and out classics or the latest thing outside of some niche places.

    • uienia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Late 80s early 90s there were literal adverts in the classified section of the paper by pirates where you could buy 100s of games for a set sum (very cheap usually). Often you mailed empty disks to them and the money, and they would return it with games. They would also have monthly printed newsletters about new titles.

      • tankplanker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Always been a bloke in the pub or car boot or whatever that can supply hooky dvds or games or hacked satellite, FAST always talks tough about busting them.

    • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Usenet was awesome. A distributed, decentralized network, with thousands of forums. Until it got taken over by spam and porn and a lack of moderation.

      Now we have Lemmy. Let’s not mess it up.

  • Ziggurat@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 months ago

    The whole political discussion about Internet media licensing, like a 10-15€ tax to finance artists while making piracy global. In the end we have the same except it’s financing Internet millionaires over artists

    • bizarroland@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      Is it weird that I don’t want to pay for any streaming media, I don’t have a cable package, but if some reasonable system were created such as that I could have access to digital copies of media for a flat monthly rate I would pay it?

      Like if someone would come and just say you pay $80 a month and you can watch listen to or read anything you can find and save them all locally for future reuse, no problems, I would probably pony up.

      • usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yes I’m also the same way with ads. I’d happily spend more for internet if there was somehow an “ad surcharge” that would mean I’d never see ads or be tracked. Let me pay whatever the advertisers pay.

        • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’d rather pay the same then use knowledge online to learn how to circumvent their bullshit. I will never pay companies to remove bullshit ‘features and items’ that make services inherently worse. It only enables them to continue molesting and raping you

          • usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I already do. I also want to pay my way.

            The problem is what I’d like doesn’t exist (I’m not going to subscribe you a million different websites and still not even be ad free) and probably can’t. How much do all the ads I’m blocking cost? It’d be ripe for abuse but I’d essentially like a taxi meter, but it would charge me for website use from just one central account that I top up or is part of my internet bill or whatever.

            I want the whole business model of using ads and tracking to pay for the internet to not exist.

  • rainynight65@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 months ago

    I had lots of time to play games, but not a lot of money to buy games.

    Now it’s the other way round.

    If I could bring back anything from back then, it’s boxed PC games that can be resold and traded. Covered a lot of my gaming needs from second hand shops.

  • eezeebee@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 months ago

    You can get an entire album or discography now. Back then I remember getting random loose mp3s of artists I was interested in, dictated by how many seeds happened to be online. Not sure I would bring that back, but it did make for some deep cuts becoming my favourite songs and not just the well known “hits” from albums.

    The most dramatic change is probably how easy it is to hear any of that music in a legit way, and hear it instantly.

    • Roopappy@lemmy.ml
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I burned CDs just titled “Pink Floyd”, “Beatles” or “Radiohead” with their entire discography of mp3s on it. I really got deep into a lot of bands back then.

  • MrsDoyle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 months ago

    There was this Russian website where you could download whole albums for like 50 cents. I absolutely loved it, because as well as current hits it also had the most obscure, crazy stuff, classical music, jazz, and world music. I think they’re all in prison now, the guys who ran it.

    • d00phy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      There were a handful of them. Two I remember are allofmp3 and something like mp3eagle. One of those introduced me to Muse around the time Black holes and Revelations came out.

    • LoganNineFingers@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Memory unlocked.

      I definitely know what you’re talking about (dispite not remembering the name of it) but they had everything. And if they didn’t, you could request it and they’d find it.

      I miss that site now