• Vanth@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    I was hanging with a group consisting of mostly older millennial gay men who don’t like that trans people are being included alongside them in conversations about human rights, sexuality, and gender. They think it takes away from the fight their community has gone through over the past few generations.

    I chewed them out. Like, a lot. I am usually not at all confrontational but I pretty much stunned them into silence. Now I’m waiting to let them process, expecting a couple to reach out to me to step back from some of the shit they were saying. If that doesn’t happen, I guess I’m not really welcome in that group anymore and I’m ok with that.

    There are no trans people in this group. I’m not a gay man nor am I trans. But when I hear shit like that, I hear echos of gay men activists not being willing to work with lesbian women activists, white feminists not includig black women, male laborers trying to keep women out of labor rights movements. It’s stupid. It’s tribal and hateful. It undercuts the strength the movement could have if we weren’t asshats about it.

    Rights campaigning 101, strength in unity. This is basic ass shit.

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      2 months ago

      Hell yeah. Concern silos divide the people.

      Trans rights are human rights

      Women’s rights are human rights

      Workers rights are human rights.

    • BumpingFuglies@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      While I do agree that unity is the way to go in the fight for rights, I can understand why one would want to separate the T from the LGB. It’s an issue of consistency - L, G, and B all describe sexuality, while T describes gender. The two are related, but ultimately separate concepts - one does not inform the other, and grouping them can hypothetically lead ignorant people to think that they are directly related, which could hypothetically lead to non-straight cisfolk experiencing more oppression than they would have otherwise experienced due to the perceived association with transfolk, as non-conforming sexuality is more generally accepted today than non-conforming gender.

      That being said, it’s all hypothetical, and what matters is the reality that people from all spectra of nonconformity are regularly oppressed, and in many places, the oppressors treat anyone LGBT+ with the same disdain. So grouping them is vital for the sake of the most oppressed.

      • lapis [fae/faer, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        I mean, you could similarly reason that bisexuals aren’t welcome (both gays and lesbians are solely attracted to the same sex, after all), or that asexuals aren’t welcome (you can be asexual and heteroromantic, after all), and so on. I think, ultimately, that unity between us is important, and allowing the umbrella to protect all members of gender, romantic, and sexual minorities strengthens the overall cause rather than weakening it.

    • BumpingFuglies@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      The creator of the format is documented as having confirmed the pronunciation is “jif”, but I don’t care. Once he created it and put it into the world, he relinquished his control.

      • DamienGramatacus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I honestly believe he was just trolling when he said that and he probably giggles to himself everytime someone says (shudder) ‘jif’. It’s a hard G from graphics so I don’t know how else is could be reasonably pronounced.

    • HatchetHaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      This is a jem of a response, but by jeneralizing pronunciations of acronyms only by the way they are spelt, you are opening a jigantic can of worms on etymology and linguistics.

      The jist of it is that English is a weird language, jenerally descriptive, and there can be many correct answers to the same pronunciation problem.

      As for me? I’m a choosy developer, and I choose jif.

      • frazorth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        jigantic

        I read that as Jig-antic. I would have to turn it into jygantik for it to sound the same.

    • notacat@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      Laser is an acronym for Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation, and yet we all pronounce it “lay-Zer” not “lay-Ser”

      • HatchetHaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        The A in amplification and E in emission are pronounced differently too, so the “correct” pronunciation would be “lah-seer”.

      • makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        GIF is an acronym. Giraffe is not. The Giraffe response has been debunked for decades.

        Graphical is a hard G.

        • derekabutton@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Debunked? Its a counterpoint to the fact that it’s pronounced that way because it’s spelled with a g. If that poor argument wasn’t used, the giraffe one wouldn’t have to come up. It’s not evidence of anything other than that letters can be pronounced in more than one way.

          For the graphical thing, imagine pronouncing NASA wrong because of the way aeronautical is pronounce. Or underwater in scuba. World in WHO? The I in AIDS isn’t pronounced anything like immunodeficiency.

          Your argument doesn’t work either.

      • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        How do you pronounce github? GIMP? GNU? GPU? Javascript?

        Oh Geremy, it’s time to jo to the jocery store! We need some jrape gelly.

      • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        If there’s ever a Giraffe Interchange Format, I’ll pronounce it the same as giraffe. And unlike some people, I’ll be able to tell the two apart.

  • FreshLight@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    In a discussion about whether liking trans women is gay or not I said that they are all missing the point. Even if it was the gayest thing on earth, being gay should never be this big of a deal. And it just shows how hard it is for some to overcome the stigma of being gay, even if they are super tolerant in general.

    That started a group discussion with a lot of different opinions on that matter.

    • donkeystomple@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m curious what makes you say that. What evidence is there to support Marxism? Isn’t Marxism just communism? Just genuinely curious. I always thought that communism has been proven not to work multiple times throughout history. Not trying to say I think Capitalism is perfect. I definitely agree that Capitalism that is unrestrained and companies that are allowed to reign free is bad for the common people.

      • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        I always thought that communism has been proven not to work multiple times throughout history.

        The more accurate lesson would be that communist nations have been defeated by capitalist hegemony multiple times throughout history, mainly during the Cold War; the countries didn’t just implode of their own accord. Now, it’s fair to criticize them for this, if you have an ideology all about material conditions and then you aren’t able to survive those conditions, you probably messed up, but I think that’s a very different assertion from “communism doesn’t work”.

        • pumpkinseedoil@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          communist nations have been defeated by capitalist hegemony multiple times throughout history, mainly during the Cold War

          You are aware of the many attempts in different countries to leave the USSR, right?

          All of them were violently shut down, that’s why the system was able to keep going, but without violence against their own population the USSR would’ve collapsed much earlier.

          • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            I’m unimpressed. The US has crushed rebellions from its inception, famously including the civil war but also many other attempts, and I would say that the patterns of what some call the New Afrikan nation within the US to revolt, going solidly up to the 1980s or further depending on your interpretation, are perhaps the most important.

            As some guy said, “Revolution is not a dinner party” and establishing and maintaining a revolutionary state requires its own violence. No Marxist says otherwise, as it is the famous quote of Engels: “The proletariat uses the State not in the interests of freedom but in order to hold down its adversaries, and as soon as it becomes possible to speak of freedom the State as such ceases to exist.”

      • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Marxism is Communism, yes. Communism has been proven to work multiple times, and does to this day.

        I suggest reading Blackshirts and Reds if that goes against what you believe to be true, though if you have specific questions I can do my best to answer.

        • Worstdriver@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Serious question, are there any true communist/Marxist nations today that would be examples of your statement?

          Sorry about terribad formatting, old phone is old

          • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Historically there have been more, such as the USSR, but currently the DPRK, PRC, Cuba, Vietnam, and Laos are explicitly Marxist. There’s a lot of misinformation surrounding them, but they retain Marxism.

            • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Is it your stance that every nominally Marxist country is actually Marxist? That there are no revisionist countries even though, for example, the USSR spent most of its existence being revisionist?

              • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                I wouldn’t say there are any “orthodox” Marxist countries, most have taken some fair bit of revisionism, but are still Socialist and practice Marxism.

                • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Fair enough, I mostly agree. I can imagine that China, Vietnam, and Laos are on the list because of, uh, capitalist roading, and the DPRK is nationalist to a reactionary degree and kind of culty, but what criticism would you apply to Cuba? Do they do capitalist roading too? I don’t hear much about them in that regard.

      • rekabis@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Insisting that all tabs should be the same length as eight spaces.

        Open up notepad, and compare. Eight spaces = 1 tab.

          • rekabis@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            And yet, that is its default definition regardless of operating system.

            That’s also why almost every IDE out there has tabs auto-set to 4 spaces, and/or gives the user to change it away from 8 spaces.

            • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              And yet, that is its default definition regardless of operating system.

              Defined by what? When does the os, rather than a program, determine how many spaces a tab is?

        • frazorth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Its funny that the argument against tabs is purely because someone once opened a file in a shitty editor.

          • rekabis@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I am not arguing against tabs. I actually find them a lot cleaner than spaces. But the default definition of a tab has it being eight spaces long, regardless of operating system.

            It’s just that “tab = 4 spaces” is either the default in a number of IDEs, and in those which it isn’t, almost everyone changes it to that anyhow.

            • frazorth
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              I didn’t think that you were. I was criticising Notepad as a really shitty “editor”.

              I personally set tabs to 2 spaces, but then thats the beauty of tabs over spaces. You can have two or four, or even eight if you hate yourself without impacting anyone else.

              People who demand spaces are Republicans, they want to force their 2/4/8 space rule on you even if it is inconsequential.

  • monovergent 🏁@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    School is where the passion for learning goes to die and the desire to cheat is born

    In this day and age, hobbies are the last bastions of passion and curiosity. One who is engaged in a hobby is intrinsically motivated to learn and apply what has been learned in novel ways, just as the scholars of old have done. School, reviled by many a student, has earned its reputation by perverting the concept of learning and exploiting students’ passions. The desire to cheat is most unnatural among students, a telltale sign that one’s passion and curiosity for the topic at hand has been extinguished, replaced with a desire to rid oneself of a burden, the burden of learning only for the sake of becoming learned.

  • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 months ago

    People should be free to vote for those who best represent them, secure in the knowledge their vote will still be counted against those they don’t want in office.

    • nutsack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      are you saying you don’t want to defund the police as a public service and have some sort of for-profit peace keeper mafia instead? what type of anarchism is this

  • MostRandomGuy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    People considered woke often only focus on institutional racism and make every other form of racism seem unimportant, including those targeting so called “whites” / Europeans. (And I’m not trying to victimize perpetrators here, I’m aware of the current and historical situation in Western countries.)

    I see that institutional racism is a huge problem, especially in the West, but that doesn’t make any other form less important or significant.

    For comparison: just because in sub-saharan Africa people starve on a daily basis due to extreme poverty caused by Imperialism doesn’t mean that poverty inside industrial nations with less harsh effects is less of a problem, especially to the individual.

  • tamal3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Telling 8th grade content teachers that they must modify their assignments to accommodate migrant students and English learners, and that just directly translating those documents forever wasn’t going to cut it. Gosh there was a lot of grumbling in the room.

    I get it, we’re short staffed and overwhelmed, but it doesn’t make it go away.