"It doesn’t make sense for chocolate bars to be divided into equal-sized chunks when there is so much inequality in the chocolate industry! The unequally-sized chunks of our 6.35 oz bars are a palatable way of reminding Choco Fans and Serious Friends that the profits in the chocolate industry are unequally divided.

And in case you haven’t noticed, the bottom of our bars depicts the West African coastline. The chunks just above it represent the Gulf of Guinea. From left to right, you have Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Togo and Benin (terribly politically incorrect, we know, but we had to combine them to create enough space for a hazelnut), Nigeria and part of Cameroon."

From https://us.tonyschocolonely.com/pages/faqs

  • stebo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    Ok but this is a good way to raise awareness about the issue. Many people will pick these bars in the store without knowing much about the brand. Then when they eat it, they will probably wonder why it’s divided like that and the explanation is right there on the inside of the wrapper.

    • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 month ago

      And then never buy them again because they are difficult to break evenly. Great idea but poor execution imo.

      • smeg
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Do you buy chocolate based on convenience over taste?

          • MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            My internal chocolate bar cost has gone way up. I find the stuff at the bottom (like the stuff at the checkout) doesn’t even taste like chocolate anymore. I usually get something from the specialty section now.

            • AWildMimicAppears@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              I agree. The budget snack items like chocolate, chips and so on have, in my opinion, lost a lot of quality; they taste a lot greasier, have worse “mouth-feel”, or are just sugar with less aroma depending on the product. I also buy less, but higher quality stuff now in comparison to 20 years ago. (Central Europe here)

          • smeg
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Fair, I do remember eating a lot of Tesco Value chocolate back in the day

      • stebo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        lol imagine sharing your chocolate bars with other people, tssk (/hj)

        fr tho if that bothers you, the inequality that comes with other chocolate brands should bother you too

        not saying Tony’s is 100% fair, but at least they put in a lot of effort to make it as fair as possible

        • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          When did I ever say anything against that or that I am ok with slavery?? I even mentioned it as a good idea but with that execution, you will be cutting your own sales. At the end of the day, it’s a product for consumers and if your idea, no matter how great and noble it is, compromises on the experience then you will lose customers.

          It well be cool to see for the first time but I certainly wouldn’t pick it up again if there are similar products with similar ideology on the shelf which is much easier to consumer. If this worked then good for them but I doubt it well work for long.

          Also who the hell mows down an entire bar in single sitting, is that an American thing? I usually buy a bar of dark chocolate and eat 1 piece after every meal or when I am bored/hungry. I would never pick something like this other than maybe the first time and fiddle with it every time making a mess trying to break a piece.

          • stebo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            if there are similar products with similar ideology on the shelf

            that’s the thing: there aren’t

            • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              There are literally hundreds of them. Maybe the availability is different in your area but I can guarantee you that they are not the only one. But regardless you are missing the point.

              It’s good for a company to be ethical but if you can’t sustain a business enough to make a difference then it’s pointless. At the end of the day, a business is there to make a profit. If you ignore majority of the customers and focus on the small fraction who cares about ethical products enough to make compromise then you can’t stay float for long.

              It’s a good novel approach to raise awareness but the cost for it is too big, that was my point.

              • stebo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Bro it’s just uneven pieces of chocolate it’s not that of a big deal. Clearly they can sustain a business because I’m encountering their products more and more often. Apparently they don’t need the support of people like you who nitpick about every little thing so go ahead and buy other brands if that’s what makes you happy.