• RGB@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    He talks shit but does barely anything all the time. The problem is that every time for the past few election cycles, the extremist supporters of each party that loses cause trouble for normal people.

    Furthermore, maybe more Democrats should have been proactive in other regions in sending the message across. I contributed along with many others in my city to getting the word out and helping spread the message to try to get Kamala elected and it is disappointing to see it didn’t happen. But immediately jumping to the conclusion it’s time to riot is rash and irresponsible.

    Also, no need to resort to ad hominem immediately. Was hoping to be civil.

    • frazorth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Why do Democrats have to spread the message that Trump literally said these things?

      If folks are voting for a turd in a suit and not listening to the things that he is broadcasting on Fox news then this not really the Dems fault it just sums up what the average American is like.

      • RGB@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m saying overall. If you want to convince someone of something you need to actually try and do it. What I meant is help explain to people in words they might understand better why it would have been more beneficial to elect one over the other. Also the level of aggression in political ads this election period was too much. Everyone was just running a smear and fear mongering campaign against each other and that really does not help us as a society.

        Even if my opinion is wrong on this. The fact that the candidate was elected through the democratic process, should dissuade rioting. That kind of show of force should be reserved for situations where someone rose to power by illegitimate means. Now if down the line Trump does something terrible (other than speaking like a moron) I’d be fully on board with more hostile measures. Protesting is okay. Rioting is going too far.

        My personal stance, however popular or not it may be, is to avoid unnecessary violence.

        • frazorth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Why do I have to convince anyone? I’m not American.

          They heard a bunch of batshit insane things and went

          That sounds sensible

          Nothing a Democrat could have done would have stopped them voting for fucking insanity. They could have literally done anything else, but chose to vote for that thing.

          The rioting has already started with the Trump supporters, so I don’t know why you’re trying to tell Democrats to not riot. They weren’t going to anyway.

        • hotelbravo722@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Then what is necessary violence? When does the rhetoric of an candidate of a major party come to the point when you can call it fascist?

          Calling a politician who

          • Fetishes an imagined great past.
          • Claims immigrants are “poisoning the blood of our country”
          • Get policy advice from individuals who call themselves christian nationalists and Neo-reactionaires.
          • And has admitted to becoming a dictator on day 1 of his presidency.

          a fucking fascist isn’t being too extreme. Its calling a spade a spade and a duck a duck.