• MexOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    We planned for active travel

    So you’ve thought about the cyclelists?

    Not that kind of active travel!

    • zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      Honestly seems more like an art project than a legitimately useful-for-any-purpose bridge - like it’s beautiful and makes the neighborhood nicer, but also… It cuts maybe 30 seconds off of the walking route?

      • GreatAlbatrossA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        When you dig into the plans, it’s pretty much that: A nice way for people to walk through the wetlands.
        It’s not designed to cut time off any journey.

      • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        That’s why I posted the picture, there’s really no reason for cyclists to go on the bridge, it might save them 30 seconds. The article is click bait

        • zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          If anything it probably makes the biking route take a bit longer, since you still have lots of walkers to dodge but a lot less room to do so, and on a curvier path with some unknown-to-me material that’s probably not as smooth as pavement.

  • Professorozone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    You know, when I buy a bike, I always buy the one that’s easiest to push because only crazy people would ever get ON one.