They will implement it in a way that makes 99% of prople worse off so no one takes it up and they can “prove” it’s not wanted.

I think I missed a joke there didn’t I…

not an advert but the departure boards on the platform at my local stations:

• Departures page 1 - 10 train departures to go through, up for like 5 seconds
• Departures page 2 - 10 train departures to go through, up for like 5 seconds
• Enginerring works - 5 words, shown for like a minute.

The tea looks about right, not sure about the tiny handle on the mug though.

not for builders tea, it’s designed with boiling water in mind.

We were a country of coffee drinkers before we were a country of tea drinkers.

there are so many flavours to explore with tea and tisanes.

Often served very strong with a lot of suger, and a bit of milk.

Builders tea is (cheap) english breakfast in a tea bag.

You are older than you feel.

Oat klim.

All sane people are.

nice! Long live feddit.uk

All fingers are crossed

Please no.

Train law and beurocaracy is complex. Running a minimal service (even if it’s a rail replacement bus) is easier and cheaper than the paperwork to remove the service.

Ooh chocolate chips!

There is another UK finance community that’s open. I posted to that one instead.

Had similar thought and hence the phrasing this post as a question. If we do make a decision we should probably codify it this instances rules so it’s a more obvious choice going forwards.

yeah I expect she was pushed