fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 15 小时前sampling biasmander.xyzimagemessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up11.03Karrow-down11
arrow-up11.02Karrow-down1imagesampling biasmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 15 小时前message-square21fedilink
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up64·15 小时前Technically theres always a bias of the most amusing answer so the “no” would be close to 5% at a minimum.
minus-squareMBM@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·12 小时前Oof I didn’t know that was a Scott Alexander thing
minus-squaremarcos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·14 小时前Yep, no survey get 0.2% of any kind of response.
minus-squareHossenfefferlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·14 小时前0.2% of surveys get some kind of 0.2% response, especially if the survey is about statistics.
minus-squarewhere_am_i@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·9 小时前that’s not how it works. That’s not how anything works! Percentile of a variable != level of that percentile.
minus-squareHossenfefferlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·9 小时前Pffft, only 0.2% of people understand surveys anyway.
Technically theres always a bias of the most amusing answer so the “no” would be close to 5% at a minimum.
Sounds like the lizardman constant
That was an amazing read, thanks!
Oof I didn’t know that was a Scott Alexander thing
Why oof? O.o
Yep, no survey get 0.2% of any kind of response.
0.2% of surveys get some kind of 0.2% response, especially if the survey is about statistics.
that’s not how it works. That’s not how anything works!
Percentile of a variable != level of that percentile.
Pffft, only 0.2% of people understand surveys anyway.