• Mzuark@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    One thing I really hate about this whole Russia-Nato situation is that it’s not a secret that the purpose of NATO is to fight Russia. Everytime these people downplay the idea of expanding closer, and closer until you have fucking missiles and a DMZ along Russia’s borders I just get annoyed, because you know damn well that any rational human would be concerned that an invasion (or false flag attack) could happen at any moment.

    • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I like the framing that NATO is a military. It is marching towards Russia, just like the Third Reich, just like Napoleon. The difference this time is that NATO isn’t fighting each country it marches through. It “negotiates” with them, tells them if they don’t let NATO in then Russia will get them, tells them they have to fund it.

      Like any good shake down, NATO occasionally launches wars of aggression to make these “negotiations” easier because of the “implication”. Sometimes when a target country isn’t amenable, the country suddenly finds a right-wing uprising and coup on its doorstep and then suddenly the country becomes more amenable to NATO. Sometimes, the right-wingers are funded and they win elections without the need for a coup and they support NATO.

      But from a strategic perspective, there is no difference in threat to Russia whether the military marching across Europe towards the Ukrainian border is Napoleonic cavalry, Third Reich armor, or NATO nukes.

    • knfrmity@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      All you have to do is listen to Putin and Lavrov. There’s a reason their true words are never presented in western media. Putin has been singing the same tune on NATO, the US, and Russia’s desired place in the world since 2008 at least. Lavrov as well. Their requests have been clear and unchanging. The US and NATO on the other hand have escalated at every opportunity.

      • COMHASH@lemmygrad.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Actually Putin was friendly with Europe, he was friends with Italian center right bourgeois parties for decades , also Chiraq of France and Austria. Even when Boris and Biden humiliated Putin about his physical appearance (shirtless and others) , he gave a calm and a fantastic elegant reply. Lukashenko is right, Putin is very calculative, he is frendly with PKK and Assad and took down ISIS once in for all.

        https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-mideast-crisis-turkey-russia-idUKKCN0YL0TY

        • SpaceDogs@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          They body shamed him? Please tell me where I can find his response to that. From what I looked up Trudeau was also mocking him, if he wanted to prove himself as a different kind of leader maybe he shouldn’t pal around with the likes of Boris fucking Johnson.

    • Shrike502@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Right? But libs are still all “Sovereign states do what they want, they’re not Russia’s backyard, they can join whatever alliances they want!!!”. And libs in Russia go even further with “Well they’re right to want to fight us! Because putler! Evil sovok! Authoritarianism!!!”

      Edit: oh look, they are doing exactly this in this very thread!

      • Shrike502@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        53
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Ya know, ten or twelve years ago, I met this gentleman from Russian armed forces. He said something that at the time seemed strange and nonsensical to me: “When we say ‘compromise’, we mean that both parties roll back a little until the end result is acceptable. It’s not perfect, but it works. But when the west says ‘compromise’, they mean one party retracts all demands, and the other gets everything it wants. That’s the cause of our difficulties with the west.”

        Turns out he was dead on the money.

    • Franfran2424@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      dont forget mexico bombing the US communities within its border, aiming to force them to abandon their culture (burgers and english language, idk?), after conducting a coup because they didnt like the pro-US democratically elected leader.

      If mexicans/canadians did half of what ukraine has done, they wouldnt exist anymore

    • SpaceDogs@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yeah this is one of the reasons I have little hope for Canada making any sort of meaningful changes at this point in time. We are moving hard right very very fast but even if a communist movement got momentum here I don’t know how we’d survive.

  • blackn1ght
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Here’s the link to the article from the tweet.

    And we have to remember the background. The background was that President Putin declared in the autumn of 2021, and actually sent a draft treaty that they wanted NATO to sign, to promise no more NATO enlargement. That was what he sent us. And was a pre-condition for not invade Ukraine. Of course we didn’t sign that.

    The opposite happened. He wanted us to sign that promise, never to enlarge NATO. He wanted us to remove our military infrastructure in all Allies that have joined NATO since 1997, meaning half of NATO, all the Central and Eastern Europe, we should remove NATO from that part of our Alliance, introducing some kind of B, or second class membership. We rejected that.

    Can definitely see why NATO wouldn’t sign it. Why would any ex Soviet bloc nation not want to be part of NATO? The NATO nations haven’t had any conflicts with Russia while the non NATO nations have had conflicts with them.

    If these nations aren’t in NATO then what stops Russia invading them? Russia saw how easy it was in 2014 in Ukraine, wanted the ex Soviet bloc countries out of NATO so he could easily invade them. All Russia has done is prove exactly why NATO exists.

    • Vertraumir@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Native Americans were never promised that colonists would not expand. They have no right to complain about it.

      Also, he was lmao

        • CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          yeah they just spent the past 8 years goading Russia into a war and have admitted to it for no reason at all, absolutely no interest there, these are just things that randomly happen sometimes.

          • DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            10 months ago

            Everything that happens is either a result of evil baddies being evil baddies and doing things because they are evil baddies, or they’re just a whoopsy-daisy accident that happen for no reason and no one planned or expected them to happen (when a member of the good guy team does anything.)

        • AmarkuntheGatherer@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          If my neighbours were surrounding me, digging up trenches and setting up gun nests, I’d want them to stop expanding too.

          If NATO isn’t an offensive alliance meant to contain Russia, why did they refuse Russia’s entry in early 2000s, when there was no anti-west posture?

          • quality_fun@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            17
            ·
            10 months ago

            If my neighbours were surrounding me, digging up trenches and setting up gun nests, I’d want them to stop expanding too.

            wrong analogy. a country simply joining nato does not mean it’s actively preparing for war.

            If NATO isn’t an offensive alliance meant to contain Russia, why did they refuse Russia’s entry in early 2000s, when there was no anti-west posture?

            did it? it is an anti-russia organization, but a defensive one. no nato country invaded russia. russia chose to invade ukraine.

            • ☭CommieWolf☆@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              28
              ·
              10 months ago

              Mate, Germany is in nato, the UK is in nato, Poland is in nato, now Finland is in nato, all of these bastards have invaded Russia in the past and have historically hated Russia and want it’s land or resources. To claim anything else either shows complete disregard for history or willful ignorance.

            • CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              22
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              But they were not simply joining NATO, were they? They are holding NATO troops and stockpiling NATO equipment and learning NATO tactics and -

              sounds like preparing for war to me, especially when Russia has started the process to join NATO and has been dismissed every time, starting all the way back with the Soviet Union when NATO was first created. Not so much a defensive alliance if the USSR couldn’t be a part of it from the start, is it?

              By the way did you know NATO was created to fight the USSR in Europe? When that never came (because the USSR never cared to invade Europe, they literally had no plans for it), NATO instead turned to Operation Gladio, which is an umbrella term to categorize the literally hundreds of operations NATO-funded neo-nazis in Europe committed? It was especially violent in Italy, but they were not the only affected country. They hoped that by doing this they could – and this is where history repeats itself – get the Soviet Union to intervene in Europe, giving NATO casus belli for war.

              Did you know the first NATO generals were nazis?