• Panda (he/him)@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    See, his mistake was not killing him during a Career Day at an elementary school. If he took out kids as well, he wouldn’t get a terrorism charge.

  • Jamablaya@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I just hope there’s people around smart enough and willing to lie, when asked in jury selection interviews, that they’ve never heard of jury nullification. I doubt they ask that in those words, because people would go look it up, but I’m sure they have a roundabout way of getting to that answer.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      The degree to which the jury pool is going to be stacked with people tied to the finance and insurance industry is going to send eyebrows through the ceiling.

  • leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    CEO’s: Second degree murder is the highest you can charge him with for killing a CEO in NY? But we want to torture him and make an example of him so the proles don’t get uppity!

    DA: No problem sirs, we can make that happen.

  • Donkter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Is there any chance that the terrorism charge is so ridiculous that it actually strengthens Luigi’s case and makes his defense better?

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Man, if the fact that Luigi, the smiling man, and the actual shooter are visibly three different people isn’t enough of a defense, nothing is. The ruling class wants to see someone punished for this crime, and rule of law bends to their will. He will be sentenced to life in prison or death by the end of this month, mark my words.

    • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Yes because it specifically allows examining his motive from a political angle which allows the defense to question the character of the guy he shot, which increases the chance of nullification.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      who knows at this point. you should ask all the other Americans who were charged with terrorism when they get out of jail.

  • Tgo_up@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    122
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    How tf can killing a single person with a handgun be classified as terrorism?

    • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      85
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Because they don’t like him.

      I mean Dylan fucking Roof shot dead 9 black people and they didn’t consider it terrorism.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Dylan Roof did get charged with hate crimes and was convicted on all 33 counts, leading to a death sentence. Stacking terrorism charges on top of that would have been pointless.

        Mangione, by contrast, is getting charged in a state without capital punishment. You need the terror charge to make this a First Degree Murder case. Otherwise he’s looking at parole after 15 years.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      62
      ·
      13 hours ago

      “They’re making us CEO’s afraid, terrified even, so he’s clearly a terrorist. The implication that the working class could actually fight back against the systemic oppression we inflict on them? That’s horrifying. We can’t allow them to believe they could ever fight back. Make an example of this person.”

      The rich assholes or something

  • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    13 hours ago

    the definition of terrorism from the FBI is very… vague

    Here’s an exerpt from the declaration of Independence :3

    • AFaithfulNihilist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      They charged him with terrorism so a regular jury won’t get to make that decision. It will be a federal grand jury of selected stooges, and maybe even a secret court.

      • EpeeGnome@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        13 hours ago

        A federal grand jury isn’t a replacement for a regular federal trial jury. They’re completely different things. A grand jury decides if there is a strong enough case to take the charges to trial, or if they should just be dismissed. When a grand jury isn’t used, the trial judge makes that determination themselves. I agree that the terrorism charge will affect how the trial is conducted, but I don’t know enough on that topic to comment further.

        • AFaithfulNihilist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          10 hours ago

          That’s true but the way that a federal jury works is very different.

          It allows them to choose people from outside of the area in which the crime occurred.

          Making it a federal trial jury instead of a state trial jury allows them to charge this single murder against an individual perpetrated by another individual who made no public statement with a much more severe crime than the state laws that he broke would normally allow.

          It’s also important to note that making it a federal trial makes it less public as there will be no cameras allowed. They don’t want him tried in the state of New York because that could legally be televised which is a bad look when you’ve already got judicial homicide lined up and the trial is purely performative.

          Being that they can choose people from all over and that the process of jury selection is even more opaque at the federal level they can make sure there won’t be any nullification issues.

          The way they are treating Luigi whether or not he’s guilty indicates that it’s not relevant whether or not he’s guilty. They legitimately don’t care, this is about sending a message that the poors don’t get to fight back.

          • kreskin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            “Nothing will meaningfully improve” is a good translation of biden/harris’s “nothing will fundamentally change” promise.

            • DeadWorldWalking@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              It also addresses people pretending like knocking down statutes and similar moral victories are meaningful progress twoards addressing real problems.