Paywall, but The Times helped the investigation, so not unreasonable.

Gist is: Sugar tried to claim he was non-dom, to save £186m in tax. However, members of HoL are officially classed as residents (because Jesus, imagine someone deciding on the laws of the country while not even officially living there)

Additionally, he’s quoted in the article saying that if he was aware, he would have stepped down…So his HoL membership is now being reviewed on the grounds that he was ready to drop his duties the moment it was convenient to him.

  • scratchee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fire the idiot, he clearly isn’t suitable for making decisions

    • jon@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      He was one of the largest donors to the Labour Party, who made him a Lord. A few years later he switched sides to the Conservatives, and had been acting like the archetypal Tory gobshite ever since.

      • mannycalavera
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh yeah? What made him switch? Was he all right before becoming a Tory?

        • jon@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          Based on how he’s been acting since he became a lord, i would guess that his donations to Labour were simply to secure him the life peerage that Labour duly gave him in 2009, and since then we’re seeing his true colours, including reposting a photoshopped photo of Corbyn with Hitler, and mocking the Senegal football team, saying they looked like street-side hawkers. Í think he occasionally bleats some sexist crap on xwitter as well.

          • mannycalavera
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            I knew he was a cunt from the telly but he sounds like a proper cunt.

        • lemmington_steele@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Labour back then were all into their ‘Third Way’ ideology (read ‘neoliberalism with a left-wing mask’) so it’s not all unlikely he barely shifted his views at all

  • Syldon
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    TBF he is not the only one who does this. Monaco exists purely for tax avoidance purposes. I have known many who have worked in Saudi and the likes. They have spent money on holidays rather than come back to the UK precisely for this purpose. I think the thing that is galling people the most is the sum of money. If he drops his Lords status then he would well be doing this in the future and no one can say a word.

    The USA has a system where you pay tax no matter where you are in the world. Do you think people should be allowed to avoid tax if they are not in this country?

    • GreatAlbatrossOPMA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      If I remember correctly too, the “travel days” don’t count. Might have changed recently, as it was a law written for steamships, not private jets.

      So someone could arrive on the first Monday flight, be there for Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, fly back Thursday evening.

      Technically only two days in the uk, so they could be around for the bulk of 45 weeks, and still be non-dom.

      • Syldon
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is a lot of obfuscation going on with tax systems. This is by design so that only those with money can take advantage of it. Crickhowell showing just this.