It appears the US congress has just proposed (edited) a bill that declares “Antifa” a terrorist organization.

This doesn’t even make sense as Antifa isn’t an organization, but just a shared name for anyone that self-identifies as a person opposed to and willing to fight fascism 🤦‍♂️

Stay safe out there!

Note: SLRPNK is an EU based service and we are openly Antifa here, and proudly so!

  • samus12345@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    The purpose of targeting an organization that doesn’t exist is that anyone who opposes the state can be labeled antifa, and therefore a terrorist.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Lookin’ good America.

    We should elect more people that do things like this instead of passing legislation to help struggling Americans.

    But, oh no, we already told the party with a voting history proving they do that on a regular basis to go fuck themselves and elected people who want to label ANTI-FASCISTS terrorists instead while releasing 1,500 actual terrorists who performed an actual terrorist act back into our society without serving their time.

    Clown country.

  • RangerJosey@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Go for it. There’s no such thing as antifa outside the minds of chuds. There’s no organization. No roster of “members”

    It’s just people who are anti-fascist as a principle. And every living WWII vet.

    • excral@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      That won’t stop them from branding any opposition as a member of antifa to justify terrorism charges. This is alarming because it is a step in systematically suppressing opposition.

  • HenchmanNumber3@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Important detail: It isn’t a bill that’s been passed. It’s only been introduced and referred to the judiciary committee. It’ll be bigger news if it gets out of the committee, goes to the floor, and gets passed.

  • VeganPizza69 Ⓥ@lemmy.vg
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    The vagueness is the point. Vague laws transfer the power to those who enforce it (ACAB) who get to decide if that law applies in that case.

    It’s the same strategy used by the Spanish inquisition. Who’s a witch? Keep it vague, and that answer becomes fully arbitrary and dependent on different social factors (such as people trying eliminate others and take their land by using such accusations). It also encourages everyone else to “signal” that they’re not whatever the bad label is… as a precaution. Preemptive antiantifa. This is basic conservative society shit.

    We saw the same thing since 2020 with the right-wing turning mask wearing into a signal for “weakness & femininity” and “leftism”, and large numbers of conservatives decided that it was better to get COVID-19 and long COVID. Note that this wasn’t STATE controlled, but it wasn’t organic either, it was more of a private astroturfing phenomenon.

    I’m not sure what the solution is, and I doubt that it’s just one single thing, but I’d love to see some ideas.

    • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s the same strategy used by the Spanish inquisition. Who’s a witch?

      The Spanish Inquisition was aimed at heretics (Jews, Protestants and Muslims), not witches.