Actor Steve Coogan and presenter Carol Vorderman have backed Liberal Democrat pledges to reform how the UK’s general elections are run.

  • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    No, they actually got a vote through for a referendum for the UK to adopt the AV+ alternative vote system system. It’s flawed, but I thought it was an improvement on first past the post and voted for it. Not enough other people agreed

    • HelloThere@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      There was never a need for a referendum, Parliament has the absolute authority to change how its elections are run.

      They should have insisted it was part of the coalition agreement, but didn’t.

      Like student loans, it was ultimately less important than being in power.

      • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        So the minority party, should have forced through a major constitutional change, which voters hadn’t voted for - in the name of democracy? And the idea of the referendum was bad.

        Interesting take.

        • HelloThere@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Well when you put it that way…

          The reality though is that both Labour and the LibDems had electoral reform in their manifestos - see Labour’s 2010 manifesto here, page 92 - and as their votes combined were more than the Tories (approx 15 million, versus 10) you could argue that clearly that was the will of the people, and it should have at least been subject to a vote in the Commons.

          Now that obviously didn’t happen, and I’m not even saying it would be a successful option in negotiation, but what did happen was that the LibDems thought - and Clegg has said this himself - that having governmental stability was more important. Even if that meant passing a lot of pretty nasty shit.

          • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            you could argue that clearly that was the will of the people, and it should have at least been subject to a vote in the Commons.

            In my opinion The LD clearly thought it was the will of the people and persuaded the Tories to run the referendum to prove this and give the change political legitimacy

    • ChrisOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unfortunately the Tories pushed hard against it “being too complicated” and “would result in more hung parliaments” and people bought that bullshit, and we ended up with another Tory government nobody wanted at the next election, which almost certainly wouldn’t have happened under AV.