This is the party of conpetence (pun intended). As soon as it looked likely this was going into the north, it quickly changed to “we cannot afford this”. This has been a storyline that has transcended decades. We are back to Jam tomorrow speeches for the north. There has been no attempt to replace what was lost from the EU. The Tories have very few mates in the north so why spend there.

  • mondoman712@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sure, but it also would’ve meant you couldn’t properly take the intercity trains off the existing lines, since they’d just go back onto the capacity constrained WCML south of Birmingham, and thus you couldn’t really do a whole lot about the capacity until that section was built.

    • JoBo
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      HS2 is about freeing up capacity for local trains, by taking fast trains off the tracks the local trains need but can’t use because they have to squeeze into the gaps between fast trains. No, you won’t get the full benefit until the entire line is built but that is always going to be true. The idea was never just about shuttling more people to London, quicker. It was about making Northern cities functional.

      • mondoman712@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Except most people on those intercity trains are trying to get to or from London, so it doesn’t make sense to just run Birmingham to Manchester. You have to run to London to get that capacity benefit.

        • JoBo
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Once more, it is about capacity for local trains, not intercity trains.