• ledtasso@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    It will create a substantial black market, but it won’t just do that. It will make it difficult to conveniently buy cigarettes, which will drastically cut down on the number of smokers.

    • krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Isn’t that what they said about alcohol, marijuana, crack, and every other thing we’ve tried to outlaw over the years? The strategy doesn’t ever seem to work and yet every time it’s proposed we get about half of people saying, oh, well this time will be different.

      • ledtasso@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s distinctly different in this case: they’re just trying to prevent people who are turning smoking age from conveniently being able to buy cigarettes. They’re not taking away cigarettes from people who can already buy them, which was not the case for prohibition.

    • bedbeard
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Let’s hope so! My main worry is it pushes things underground where you can’t really track and regulate anything, which has happened in other prohibition policies.

      I think I’d be more up for it if smoking use was trending in the wrong direction but it’s been pretty consistently trending downwards since the 70s. But if it accelerates the decline then that would definitely be a positive.

      • davepleasebehave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        it’s harder to smuggle loads of cigarettes because of the size of each bundle.

        perhaps people will smuggle in powdered nicotine and make vape juice for cheap.