There’s something really funny about Cruella accusing Sunak of betraying the public on policies that the public never asked for.

Funny, I didn’t see anti-trans being one of the main issues here. Weird that she’s like “and you’re not being anti trans enough!” like it’s a point.

Yeees, goooood, destroy each other!

It’s like she’s saying the quiet parts loud, only putting it in a letter and signing it.

This is the best summary I could come up with:

Mrs Braverman, a leading figure on the right of the party, claimed she struck a secret deal to serve in Mr Sunak’s cabinet in exchange for a series of commitments, after Liz Truss’s premiership imploded last year.

A No 10 spokesman thanked Mrs Braverman for her service, but added: “The prime minister was proud to appoint a strong, united team yesterday focused on delivering for the British people.”

“I have become hoarse urging you to consider legislation to ban the hate marches and help stem the rising tide of racism, intimidation and terrorist glorification threatening community cohesion,” she added, accusing the PM of putting off “tough decisions in order to minimise political risk to yourself”.

Mrs Braverman told the PM that if the ruling went against the government, he would have “wasted a year” on the Illegal Migration Act, which aimed to stop small boat crossings, “only to arrive back at square one”.

Mrs Braverman said the government’s policy was “far from secure against legal challenge”, and even if it won in the Supreme Court it would “struggle to deliver” on the Rwanda scheme because of “compromises” insisted on by Mr Sunak in legislation.

A No 10 spokesman said the government had “brought forward the toughest legislation to tackle illegal migration this country has seen and has subsequently reduced the number of boat crossings by a third this year”.

The original article contains 752 words, the summary contains 229 words. Saved 70%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!