• tankplanker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Next up, “leaving the ECHR is the only way to stop the boats”, which I suspect is why RIshi didn’t really bother with a proper plan b.

    I do wish they would actually tackle the problem by increasing funding and efficiency for claims processing.

    • thehatfox@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sunak appears to be still pushing ahead, and has claimed there will be more negotiations with Rwanda to try make the policy work. He has also said:

      If it becomes clear that our domestic legal frameworks or international conventions are still frustrating the plans at that point, I am prepared to change our laws and revisit those international relationships.

      So it looks the ECHR is also now in Sunak’s crosshairs.

      • tankplanker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        May raised a good point that just removing ECHR doesn’t actually make Rwanda lega by itself, we would still have to make further changes to do so. However I do not actually think that matters to them as ECHR has always been the goal here, Rwanda never really scaled to be a proper solution to the problem even if it wasn’t unethical and was legal. The entire small boats issue has always been a Tory manufactured excuse to drum up outrage.