• d00ery@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I think that follows the rules of contractions by using an apostrophe to signify missing letters.

        However, I’m not American, but I thought it was written as “Y’all”.

        In UK English “you’ll” is “you will”.

        • Echo Dot
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m also not American. But autocorrect changed it to You’ll so I went with it.

          Anyway, I think it’s perfectly understandable from context.

          • Pretzilla@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nope. You’ll is commonly and I’ll even say exclusively read as ‘you will’.

            Y’all is more understandable and fitting. It’s a colloquial southern expression with a quaint twang to it to boot that augments the point.

          • Pretzilla@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nope. You’ll is commonly and I’ll even say exclusively read as ‘you will’. As in I’ve never seen or noticed it used as ‘you all’.

            Y’all is more understandable and fitting. It’s a colloquial southern expression with a quaint twang to it to boot that augments the point.

      • robotopera@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You are all is mostly shortened to y’all as well. This would be a very informal usage, and y’all should probably not be used in any professional correspondence.

        Example: you are all basic would be y’all basic.

        • 5too@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          I thought “you all” was y’all? “You are all” should be y’all’re, right?

          Why would you miss the chance to double up on contractions?!

          • owenfromcanada@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, “y’all’re basic” works, but “y’all basic” works too. It’s common to drop the verb in this context, as it’s implied.

              • owenfromcanada@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                “Correct” isn’t really a thing with language.

                Language is constantly changing and evolving. The rigid rules we are typically taught in grade school are less rigid than we’re led to believe–in the end, “correct” language is whatever works to convey information from one person’s head into another.

                In this case, dropping the verb doesn’t impact our ability to understand the meaning. It’s called null copula and you probably do the same thing in other contexts (e.g., “You coming?”).