• ReallyKinda@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I agree. Governments just don’t care (in the actionable sense) about homelessness except when it gives rise to disruptive or ‘criminal’ behavior, so they tend to associate it with those things.

    TBH I think the gist of the “mental health” claim stems from the massive amount of Vietnam vets the Fed unceremoniously abandoned to the streets. To claim these people were homeless due to mental health wouldn’t be totally inaccurate, but it definitely buries the lead. More than 1 in 10 homeless people are vets in the US.

    • LemmyLefty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s probably also a holdover from closing down asylums, with the added implication that mental health issues are both permanent and disruptive enough that attempts to house people is a losing battle so we need not try.

      • kool_newt@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why pay to take care of mentally ill people when you can let them out, arrest and enslave them? – Reagan probably

    • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why would they care?

      1. The homeless don’t donate to their legalized bribery PACS, and

      2. The oligarchs who own both parties and captured our government decades ago want significant homelessness. Sticks, like capitalism scarecrows on street corners scaring the shit out of you to keep showing up to your meaningless job to be exploited for the owner’s profit, are free.

      Why pay for carrots (wages, benefits, careers, basic respect) when the the threat of sticks, ie visible homelessness, is free?

      There is no incentive for our nation’s owners to tell their middle managers in Washington to address homelessness, and every incentive to make it worse.

      • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Ok?

        So give them a small apartment to do their hopeless drugs in until they pass away. They’re human beings mostly interested in harming themselves, which is more benevolent than the fortune 500s motivation to take as much as they can at society’s expense.

        You act as if insatiable greed isn’t an addiction, a drug with far more potential for harm to others than something like heroin. Greed lets peope hurt others and call it “just business.”

        • Deftdrummer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Not quite sure how the two relate. You completely hijacked what I said because “slamming” corporate entities is the in thing right now.

          Buy some stocks and play the game. You’ve gotta be smarter. Otherwise quit your whining.

          Also who’s buying and paying rent for these drug condos? Not me. Not my taxes. I don’t work hard so others can fuck up their lives. I’d like to live wontonly too but I don’t.

          • Dkcecil91@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I hope you one day get to live “wontonly” as you’d like to. Then maybe you too can die in the street, addicted to drugs. Either way, maybe you’ll spell wantonly right the next time you try to use a semi-large word while trying to sound like a blowhard intellectual.