The owners of the Crooked House pub near Dudley have been ordered to rebuild it after the historic building was destroyed in a suspected arson attack.

Once known as “Britain’s wonkiest” inn, the 258-year-old pub in Himley was reduced to rubble following a fire on 5 August 2023.

In a post on X, West Midlands Mayor, Andy Street, praised South Staffordshire Council, adding: "An enforcement notice has been issued against the owners for its unlawful demolition.

“They have been ordered to rebuild the pub back to what it was before the fire - just as we’ve been lobbying for.”

  • @Nighed@sffa.community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    183 months ago

    What do you bet the owning company will suddenly go bankrupt (because all it’s assets have strangely been sold for £1 to a new company with the same directors)

    • Big P
      link
      English
      83 months ago

      Even if they don’t do that I think they’ll go bankrupt, recreating the pub is probably far more expensive than they can afford

      • @Nighed@sffa.community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        63 months ago

        I think they are a reasonably large and apparently infamous (even before this) developer. They should have the assets to do this. Whether they actually use them or hide them is up for question.

        • @_xDEADBEEF@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          103 months ago

          They’re clearly morally bankrupt. They’ll do anything to not comply with the order if there’s no money in it for them.

          • @Nighed@sffa.community
            link
            fedilink
            English
            23 months ago

            It depends if the directors.can be found legally liable. I don’t think they can be financially liable unless it can be proved they have done something illegal (depending on their company setup)

            • Devi
              link
              fedilink
              43 months ago

              They burned their pub down, that’s definitely illegal. They then bulldozed it before the fire investigators could come in, extra illegal.

  • GreatAlbatrossMA
    link
    English
    73 months ago

    Damn, you beat me to posting this.
    I wanted to put a single “:)” as the blurb.

  • @JoBo
    link
    English
    33 months ago

    Come the fuck on!

  • tal
    link
    fedilink
    1
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I can’t imagine that it’d be possible to do that and conform to building code without some kind of special exemption.

    Honestly, I’d think that if there’s demand for a leaning pub like that – and I think there is…I mean, I’ve heard about that thing repeatedly, seen video in it, and I live in the US – it’d be easier to just build one whose owners want to run one, let them gave whatever building code exemptions are required. IIRC, that pub is kind of out of the way, not really where one would expect to put a new pub, given the choice.

    • GreatAlbatrossMA
      link
      English
      43 months ago

      It’s a historical artefact, with history dating back to 10 years before the Declaration of Independence.

      In cases like this, the order is often to rebuild as it was, even if it contravenes building regs for a new structure, as it’s technically just restoring the old one.

      They may do some construction with modern materials (for example, using a steel frame), but the finish will need to be the same as it was before destruction.