Archive

The housing secretary is considering abolishing [Right to Buy] for newly built council houses and cutting the discount offered to existing tenants.

The deputy prime minister is facing growing pressure from local authorities to reduce the cost of Baroness Thatcher’s flagship policy, and a consultation on proposals will be launched in October’s Budget.

More than 100 local authorities called for the scheme to be axed on new council homes in a damning report into the state of Britain’s housing stock published on Tuesday. The report, commissioned by Southwark Council, said the policy was helping to burn a £2.2bn hole in local authority accounts and exacerbating the country’s housing crisis.

Ms Rayner attended an “urgent meeting” with local authorities last month to discuss housing reforms. The Ministry of Housing and Local Government told The Telegraph: “We are working at pace to reverse the continued decline in the number of social rent homes.”
[…]
In Southwark Council’s report, local authorities said Right to Buy had created “a serious problem for the sustainability of England’s council housing”. Ms Rayner said in the summer that the Government was considering protections for new council homes.

Discounts on the scheme can reach as much as £75,000 outside of London, and over £100,000 in London. The cap, which is based on how long a tenant rents a property before buying it, is limited to £136,400 in London.
[…]
In the last financial year, 10,896 homes were sold through Right to Buy and only 3,447 were replaced, official figures show – resulting in a net loss of 7,449. Since 1991, the scheme has resulted in a net loss of 24,000 social homes.

This is partly because under the current system, councils can only keep a third of the receipts from each sale to build a replacement home, with the rest going to the council and government for other purposes.

  • mannycalavera
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    Do this but… Build a new fucking city you bastards! Including all the infrastructure and housing and high street and transport.

    • Blackmist
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 days ago

      Is that a great idea? Most of the New Towns became shitholes.

      I know somebody from Skelmersdale, and the only place they’d been that was worse was Blackpool.

      • mannycalavera
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        12 days ago

        Is it a shit hole because there’s nothing to do and no jobs? Well that’s fair.

        But if we’re going to build more houses and towns then we need to get that part right as well. Drawing all the wealth and life of the country into the South isn’t great in the long term.

        • Blackmist
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          12 days ago

          I live in the East Midlands, so I’d agree. Just about everything around here is a former something town, be it mining, manufacturing, whatever. Anything that isn’t is some picturesque place is a scrabble of smackheads and vapeshops.

          Really need to start giving tax breaks to big companies to build their shit in unpopular places and have good public transport so people can get to it.