Experts from a “nudge unit” have been hired to help ministers fight misinformation about heat pumps to try to encourage take-up of the devices.

The appliances run on electricity instead of gas and are regarded as a way of decarbonising homes at scale. A target of installing 600,000 a year by 2028 is part of a drive to achieve Britain’s commitment to reach net zero by 2050.

However, misinformation shared in the media and by “other stakeholders” is impeding uptake, according to a £100,000 government contract awarded to the Behavioural Insights Team (BIT), which specialises in ideas to “nudge” the public into taking different actions.

The contract awarded to BIT contains details of a previously unpublished research by the Department for Energy.

It found that individuals who self-reported that they knew a fair amount or a lot about heat pumps were less likely to want one. However, people who correctly answered a simple knowledge question about heat pumps were more likely to want one.

BIT is finalising a large survey of householders’ views and coverage in the media that will be used in planning how the government will push back against misinformation.

“Information about heat pumps is being shared by the media and stakeholders, which may be skewed to negative, incorrect or exaggerated stories of heat pump adoption,” says the contract, which cites examples including claims that the pumps are noisy, cost too much to install and are not reliable and don’t work in older homes.

Articles about heat pumps in the Daily Mail and the Daily Telegraph were cited in the document, which states that some of these stories “are generally well-founded, such as believing that heat pumps are expensive” but adds that some include incorrect misconceptions, such as believing they might not work well in the cold.

“Online information which is imbalanced or skewed towards incorrect and exaggerated claims could be considered an environment where misinformation is a problem,” it reads.

  • fakeman_pretendname
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    It might take quite a bit of wondering to work out specifically who, but I think you can gather the general gist of whose agenda they’re promoting without too much wondering :)

    • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝OPA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      Oh I’ve got a good general idea but I’d love to know the specifics - are they doing it to be contrarians or because it’s a fairly well-accepted Tory press narrative or are think tanks funded by fossil fuel companies giving them “press releases” or “talking points” that a “journalist” then reworks into what passes for an “article”?

      • fakeman_pretendname
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Yeah, I’d like to actually know, rather than just guess. I always felt it might merely be a case of “it’s the sort of thing liked by the type of people we don’t like”.

        To be fair, I’m doing exactly the same thing back at them.