• mannycalavera
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Don’t fine him directly. Fine doing business with his company interests to starve him of income. Like the modern slavery laws. It’s useless going after the slavers but if caught using people that have been trafficked then your company gets a hefty fine and make it expensive to show that you comply. Something like that but for advertising on sites that intentionally spread misinformation and do little to nothing to prevent it (i.e. Twitter).

    • HumanPenguin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Do you honestly think that would stop him taking the UK gov to court.

      It would not. He would claim it is a personal attack on his companies rights to free speech.

      Remember, this is not about having a valid case. It is about who has the greatest limitation on spending. Elon spending his own money. Or a gov that must argue it is a valid use of voters money.

      • mannycalavera
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Do you honestly think that would stop him taking the UK gov to court. It would not. He would claim it is a personal attack on his companies rights to free speech.

        Then the goal for any legislation is simple: don’t make it personal to Twitter and instead reference “platforms that openly allow misinformation and hate on their servers that do business in the UK without appropriate and swift moderation”. Something like that.

        The goal won’t be to fine Twitter or Musk directly. It will be to move the needle in a way that makes doing business with him or his companies not worth the hassle. Musk could win the court battle, but ultimately lose his hate machine. Absolutely fine 😉.

        But let’s be honest… None of this will happen 😂.