Former sub-postmaster Alan Bates says he will consider raising funds for private prosecutions of Post Office bosses over the Horizon IT scandal.

He told the BBC he would act if the authorities did not take cases forward.

“It was fine when the Post Office brought private prosecutions, so if we’ve got to do it in return so be it”, he said.

  • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Why the fuck do private prosecutions still exist?

    Because you probably don’t want the state to have monopoly on prosecutions

    • NateNate60@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yes I do. Of all the options available, this is the best one. Any other option is worse by comparison.

      • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Interesting, so why would you prefer to live in a world where the Crown decided not to prosecute and Alan Bates was prevented from doing so?

        • NateNate60@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Yes, because for every one Alan Bates case, there are ten cases of billion-pound companies abusing this right, such as… oh, I don’t know, perhaps a few involving the Post Office?

          • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            The ones bought by the post office weren’t typical private prosecutions - the Post Office is one of a handful of bodies allowed to directly bring prosecutions alongside the CPS. Yes, very happy to have those organisations lose they right.